People call left wing podcast discourse to be terminally online but god damn how did these right wing become such soyboys crying about shooting at ones and zeros.

I hope someone makes a game where if you shoot a cop in the game, a cop magically dies irl.

  • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unethical against what system of ethics? Ethics are a system or morally based policy and is generally applied to a professional field. These geeks always use the term ‘unethical’ as a substitute for ‘immoral’ which is what they really mean, but ‘immoral’ is an individual value jusgement and subjective where ‘unethical’ implies a pre established code of ethics that wasn’t followed and is an objective statement. So they’re using the wrong word to make their opinions seem like facts.

      • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        They either know what they’re doing or are just bad with words. They’re commonly turned into synonyms, and it bugs me cause of what I posted above. Not knowing about words makes you more susceptible to propaganda, knowing the precise meanings of words let’s you know how dumb marketing is

    • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also ‘morals’ and ‘ethics’ are used interchangeably in general too often, being a linguistic percrisriptivist is always gonna be a lost battle, but I don’t like when a language evolves to lose words or to make two words synonyms when they weren’t before. Like precise word choices because I know precisely what is being said, don’t be a vibes based language any more than necessary

      • JuryNullification [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, prescriptivism in technical terminology is good IMO. We need consistent definitions to discuss technical subjects, and people who study and discuss the technical subjects should be familiar with the prescribed definitions. Like, you’ll have a difficult time understanding theory if you think “materialism” is used as “driven to acquiring material goods”

        In general conversation, prescriptivism is shit and should be avoided

      • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think that’s where they started using the word wrong all the time or deceptively. Although in this case the deception is in the entire premise, they’d be using the words ethics correctly if the whole sentence wasn’t a lie.

    • Tachanka [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Putting on my tinfoil hat for a second: Rockstar paid them to make these videos so they could get counterculture marketing for the first time in almost 2 decades

      • WeedReference420 [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I genuinely wouldn’t be surprised, a big part of the marketing of the original GTA back in 1997 was leaking information about how you can kill cops and pedestrians to conservative morality crusaders and right wing rags like the Daily Mail. All of the “Ban this sick filth!” tabloid headlines were apparently celebrated by the dev team because they knew every British (and soon after international) kid would desperately want to check the game out lmao

    • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It wasn’t just the video. The ones who restarted this “killing cops in a video game is bad” discourse are right wing fascists. See Elon Musk and Andrew Tate.

      Andrew Tate, claiming to be manly and strong while crying about dead cops in a video game.

  • Stoatmilk [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m glad to see that being able to express aesthetic criticism only in terms of morality is not exclusively a leftist problem

  • Keith@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did you… watch the video? His point is that even without real world harm, the game is still immoral— and he doesn’t even take that position, he just considers it.

    • valkyrie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I didn’t watch the video. But given that wouldn’t most popular games be immoral. The vast majority of games involve killing.

      • Keith@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean he doesn’t actually tell you that it’s immoral, he says “maybe it’s immoral” and then says “I’ll play it” so he obviously doesn’t hate players, he just gives some interesting thoughts.

    • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If that’s the entire stance, then I agree. To the extent that games promote the status quo. Games like COD do not have real world consequences but it reinforces American hegemony. But GTA just takes the piss out of everything with few of the games having anything real to say, so it’s not immoral in my eyes.