Donald Trump fired off an angry middle-of-the-night attack on “highly overrated Jewish Governor” Josh Shapiro after he spoke out against the former president at the Democratic National Convention on Wednesday night.

  • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    Ah yes the strategy of trying to court jewish Americans by *checks notes* being blatantly antisemitic. There’s no real reason to mention he’s Jewish here other than to be antisemitic and imply he’s a “bad jew”

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      At this point there is no chance of “court(ing)” enough voters to win. MAYBE when all anyone knew of Biden was a guy who chugged a bottle of nyquil before a debate for some reason but even america isn’t stupid enough to legitimately vote in trump anymore.

      If trump wins it will be because of decades of gerrymandering and outright election theft through court cases, bad faith electors, and violence.

      And shit like this? This is the threat. Explain that anyone who breaks ranks is going to be just as much of a target as pence was.

      Hell, I wouldn’t be shocked if we have a “Jan 6 was a day of patriotism” ad before this 70-something days is up.

      • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        but even america isn’t stupid enough to legitimately vote in trump anymore.

        I’m afraid you’re vastly underestimating the stupidity of Americans. I just hope enough people vote.

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          They’re stupid enough when it comes to not voting at all. If everyone showed up and voted for who they prefer, no Republican would ever be president again (unless they pivot away from being the Fascist Party).

            • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              One thing there that shouldn’t be discounted is how hard it was for folks working multiple jobs, who have to take care of their kids, etc to be able to get to a voting booth.

              Long lines, inaccessible mail in voting, and so on have long been issues especially for the lower income bracket where they aren’t getting the option to work from home that day, or live in an area where there are so many booths that the line takes 10 minutes to get through.

              So I wouldn’t say its all “stupid” people who don’t vote. These were intentional decisions made by others trying to limit access to voting, and in the past, it worked. The moment mail in voting became ubiquitous, there was a massive increase in voters.

              Pushing for keeping options open for everyone to vote, including making it a federal holiday, consistently available mail in voting, ensuring access to sufficient booths, etc, is of utmost importance.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        My parents seem like normal somewhat rational people. They are still planning to vote for Trump. Please stop with this “we’ve already won” shit. It can only cost us the win. Go vote. It’s far from guaranteed. It honestly looks to be pretty close to an even race right now.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago
          1. Your parents are not “somewhat rational people” if they are voting for a hateful bigot and rapist who is openly compromised by foreign powers and openly talking about how people only have to vote “one more time”
          2. Please read posts before responding to them
          3. We have popular republicans speaking at the DNC and getting cheered. There was a LOT of stupidity about Biden (“He is anti-Palestine so we should let trump win instead!”) but he is gone and there is no time to make a proper attack against Kamala. trump is not going to sway additional voters and is already losing “moderates” who are desperate for anything other than a rapist lunatic who would love Gilead if he knew how to read.

          That is why the focus is on strong arming his party and elected officials to remind them that he led a literal fucking lynch mob against the last republican who crossed him by… not shitting on the constitution on Jan 6.

          if trump wins it is not going to be by a popular vote (it was never going to be that). It is not even going to be by barely squeaking by on the electoral college. It is going to be by getting close and then using outright theft and violence to get the rest of the way.

          Which is why, even if someone is too stupid to understand that there are down ballot candidates who matter just as much (arguably moreso), they still need to vote. Because we need a landslide so that there are no elected (or military…) officials who decide that they want to be on “the winning team” and defy the will of the people. And that is who trump is campaigning to at this point.

          • slickgoat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Almost half the country will vote for the orange ape. Don’t other this guy’s parents. If everyone voted the country wouldn’t be in this situation anyway. Take 40% out of the voting pool (not even counting voter suppression) and the ill-informed will vote alongside the hyper-informed.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s a rational view, but not born out by past experience. Sadly, there are apparently a huge number of horrible Americans who still think Trump is exactly right.

        Hillary got flak for calling Trump supporters a “basket of deplorables,” but in hindsight that was a kind way of saying it.

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      But he specifically said he didn’t have a series of mini strokes, when nobody had asked. Claimed he was getting ahead of a rumor he said everybody was spreading when nobody had ever heard it.

      I think that clears it up.

      • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        He’s going to be a handful for his handlers when the big one hits him and his face drops on one side and he is only able to move about in a wheelchair

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    trump really wanted Kamala to pick this guy as VP, it’s why it’s not the first time he’s brought Shapiro up and why he even knows his name.

    • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Shapiro would have given him so much material to work with. He would have called him a classic coastal elite, uppity lawyer, dyed-in-the-wool career politician. He would have called him an Obama impersonator.

      Walz is giving him no angles of attack, it’s really an inspired pick.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Walz is giving him no angles of attack, it’s really an inspired pick.

        Republicans don’t have a counter for wholesome.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Walz is giving him no angles of attack, it’s really an inspired pick.

        But it’s the type of politicians the Dem party should always be running…

        Kamala is doing a lot better than Biden, but someone like Walz would be doing the Super Bowl Shuffle all the way to the White House without breaking a sweat.

        He’s the type of candidate our voters want, and how he went from completely unknown to ridiculously popular in like a month just shows that the “name recognition” stuff was always bullshit.

        Walz isnt unique. He’s great, but there’s lots of politicians out there like him. It’s just almost impossible for them to get to the national stage when the DNC, media, billionaires, and lobbists like AIPAC want neoliberals.

        • Poayjay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Exactly. No one voted for Kamala. People didn’t vote for Biden, they voted against Trump. Hilary won the primary because Warren split the progressive vote and wouldn’t drop out.

          Dems haven’t put forward a truly clean and charismatic leader since Obama.

          • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Warren ran in 2020. Hillary won in 2016 because of superdelegate bullshit creating an air of inevitable victory before a single vote had been cast and the DNC actively working to suppress the Sanders campaign through smear tactics and a severely limited debate schedule.

        • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          They’ll never come out and say it openly, but I sense a strong theme in the Harris campaign of “we’re also running to give the republican party the impetus to kick Trump and his cronies to the political nothingness that they deserve to be in”

          With so many people saying “I’m a republican but I’m voting for Harris”, it’s very clear that this election is just as much about Republican’s reclaiming their “grand ole’ party” from the cult of personality that has taken it over. It’s a shame that they have to literally vote with their opponent in order to make that happen. But the thought process seems to be “Let’s get dominated, spend the next four years purging ourselves of Trump and his idiotic sycophants, and then come back in the next election and fight with dignity again.”

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Trump wholely controls the RNC, they’re not working against him.

            Republican voters are willing to vote for Harris when they wouldn’t vote Biden, because Biden was just honestly a bad candidate. Now that the candidate is better, more people are willing to cross party lines and vote D.

            It would have happened in 2016 and 2020 too if we ran better candidates.

            Hell, it happened 2008 and 2012 when Obama ran. Not only did people vote for him. He flipped a lot of state governments in “red states” blue.

            Because he changed people’s minds about what the democratic party was.

          • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I never got the concept of Republicans going back to running honorable candidates. They haven’t since Lincoln. The Republican candidates for just this century have been a certified pedophile, a Mormon, a man who chose Sarah fucking Palin as his running mate, and Bush. Hell, before that you had Reagan, who if you wanna blame America’s problems on one man, he’s the one. You had Bush Sr., who wasn’t completely awful and was granted 1 term for it. You’ve got Nixon and Watergate. You’ve got Eisenhower being almost impressively racist.

            The Republican party hasn’t had a good candidate in decades, if not well over a hundred years. Were they less openly insane before? Sure. Were they actually less insane? Absolutely not. These are the people that manufactured the drug crisis, leading to the pointless deaths and arrests of thousands of black people.

      • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        No, see Walz has some huge weaknesses that Trump and Vance can expose! He, errr… [checks notes] visited China and got addicted to a video games console for a while?

  • Plopp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    What do they mean “goes off the rails”? The man hasn’t even seen a rail in over a decade, let alone been on one.

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Picking a fight with another governor that has higher approval than he has in a state he must win? Please proceed, Don.

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I swear to GOD he’s trying to get out of getting elected but remain visibly hurt enough to get funding. He’s struck out and flipped off every demographic save for white Christian males. And he’s still pulling 49% at betting sites.