Them trying to buy Judges indicates that Judiciary still holds power in the US at least to some extent

  • tired_n_bored@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    170
    ·
    2 days ago

    Immagine if Soros spent $25M on a candidate. Musk and the right would be furious, would be calling it “election interference by the deep state”

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      We all really, really need to abandon the idea that pointing out hypocrisy and inconsistency does or means anything to anyone. Literally it’s all we do all day on the left, and all it does is signal to the orcs that they’re winning. As long as we’re outraged and pointing out this thing or that thing we’re angry about, they feel they’re winning.

      They are simply not complex enough to care or internalize anything deeper about the notion of hypocrisy so it’s just a noise to them, and even to the larger liberal America broadly, they don’t know what’s real or not anymore and have totally tuned out the news. Foreign agents have been seeding both sides of every debate for so long, that average people who don’t follow every story just see both sides screaming the other is lying and go back to work. They vote for whoever social media tells them is good.

      We need to redirect energy to telling a new story, about how the wealthy are taking our future, and abandon this endless, worthless parade of reactions. We are always on response, never proactive, never trying to change the story or get ahead of it, always screaming about this latest bad thing they did and focusing on it like they want. We can do a lot better broadly.

    • Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, they are lying hypocrites with no actual morals who are more than happy to lie directly to our face.

      This isn’t news, stop being shocked by this.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        The American right in general has no unified ideology or thought. It’s just a bunch of angry idiots.

        • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 day ago

          Strong disagree; they have an ideology, it’s just one that people on the left find disgusting because we value equality and they value the polar opposite: heirarchy.

          They’ve also captured the majority of State houses and all three branches of the federal government. They’re highly organized with a sophisticated political media that knows how to communicate with their target demographic.

          They believe that societies are successful when the right people are empowered; it’s why the talking points against DEI work so well— they see it as a restructuring of heirarchy back to their proper order. It’s why they push for Christian & white Nationalism— they want the “right” people to rule. Every policy they push for is framed by this dynamic.

          They have goals, vision, drive, plans, and power. What is that if not an ideology? If the left continues to underestimate the reactionary right, we will continue to fail.

          • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Excellent point. I’m no political expert, but I can see that what we’re doing right now isn’t working. No matter how much we point out how awful the Right is, we aren’t winning voters because they aren’t really seeing it. For the person who thinks an immigrant took his job and is why he’s not getting ahead today, hearing that a bunch of them got loaded on a plane and taken to an El Salvadorian gulag isn’t a bad thing. It’s a good thing, because that’s fewer undesirables polluting the country and ‘taking our jerbs’. It also doesn’t affect them. Who cares if some brown dad from Maryland got sent to the gulag by accident. That’s somebody else’s problem. The people we’re trying to reach don’t care about that. If sending the Browns to a labour camp brings the price of eggs down, then well, too bad so sad, send 'em all off so Ah can get muh eggs ‘n’ gas for cheapah! Murica fuck yeah!

            Let’s get real. All our bloviating about how dumb the GQP is and how evil they are serves once purpose – preaching to the choir. We keep insulting their intelligence, insisting they have no plan, saying we’re smarter than they are, and accusing their voters of being morons barely able to breathe on their own, but we keep losing elections to these supposed morons. Our leadership and our pundits have forgotten the most important role for leaders and pundits – convincing people that we’re right and the other side is wrong. Meanwhile, the GQP has cornered the information space, sent us reeling, gotten enough people to stay home, vote third party, or actually vote for their shitheads, and basically shock and awe us in 2016 AND 2024. Really, if you stop and look at how well we got outplayed, you gotta question who the real morons are. Doubly so now that they’re in power, and rather than stepping back and pointing out the resulting shitshow is 100% on Team Red, we’re helping them fuck the country over, repeatedly. That really fits us for the dunce cap in my book.

            I hope that AOC and Sanders’ message sticks. I think it’s a good one. As billionaires get tax cuts while we pay more and more for essentials, the message that we’re being fucked by the moneyed class should stick harder. While it wasn’t enough to win us those two Florida seats (an awful lot of awful people still vote in Florida), it DID seem to reverse our fortunes in Wisconsin, and we managed to keep the courts liberal over there. But even this has its flaws. I think a lot of people have the idea that Democrats are just a party of talking, not of action. And that idea isn’t wholly unearned. Democrats do have a habit of throwing their hands up and giving up when the going gets tough. What they need to do is fire up Billy Ocean and rise to the occasion, fighting for all our rights and convincing through both words and actions that they are the better chance. We’ll never pick off the hard-core Q-Anon nutcases, but if we can convince some of the 7 million that didn’t vote for Trump in 2020 but did in 2024 to stay home or vote third party, if not vote for us, and we can get some of the 90m that stayed home in 2024 to turn out now for the Democrats, that’s good. Here’s hoping that Democrats put actions to the words we’re seeing right now, otherwise this will be short-lived. And all we’ll have is the ability to shake our fists at the evil, stupid Republicans.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The right would argue he spends billions on every election. But it’s dark money. Elon has the balls to let people know where the money is coming from. Not all heroes wear capes. Some wear hair plugs and children as body armor.

  • butsbutts@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    that’s like someone with some savings spending 25$ to buy an election what a cheap fuck

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s a big deal for Wisconsin but Elon just saw it as an excuse to flex on state election laws.

      The real upshot of the vote was that, once again, wealthy people are allowed to commit crime with impunity. Now Elon’s goon squad goes back to the drawing board to find a better way to cheat.

    • reiterationstation@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not even. He makes 96 million a day from nothing. Keep your “it’s not liquid!!” To yourself, the money spends regardless.

    • Devmapall@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      He really spends his money poorly

      I could do so much with his wealth with far less harm caused

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    2 days ago

    please someone have a still frame of him jumping like a dipshit in that cheese hat.

    fucking troglodyte.

  • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    They got the TV, we got the truth

    They own the judges and we got the proof

    We got hella people, they got helicopters

    They got the bombs and we got the, we got the

    We got the guillotine

    We got the guillotine, you better run

  • ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Trump has this to say:

    VOTER I.D. JUST APPROVED IN WISCONSIN ELECTION. Democrats fought hard against this, presumably so they can CHEAT. This is a BIG WIN FOR REPUBLICANS, MAYBE THE BIGGEST WIN OF THE NIGHT. IT SHOULD ALLOW US TO WIN WISCONSIN, LIKE I JUST DID IN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, FOR MANY YEARS TO COME!

    Sounds like Trump has plans to make sure people like Susan Crawford don’t get elected in the future.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just 10 years ago people would’ve called any politician who said moronic stuff like this a sore loser. And every non-expert would see that he is actually talking about cheating himself. What happened? The sanewashing needs to stop.

      Sounds like Trump has plans to make sure people like Susan Crawford don’t get elected in the future.

      It’s one of their stated goals. They’ve been against making voting easier fror the disenfranchised since day one. Day zero actually. Before that. For decades. Maybe close to a century now.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          But his particular sore loser attitude didn’t kick in until he lost the 2020 election. In fact in 2016 he was high on accusing Clinton of being a sore loser, for no particularly good reason. He loved calling out a sore loser until he lost.

          He had plenty of bad behaviors, but being a sore political loser wasn’t one of them at that point.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      What does this mean?

      Isn’t the election finished?

      What does he mean “it should allow us to win wisconsin”

      • ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The current election is done, but there will be more in the future. I believe he’s referring to those.

    • Valorie12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      . IT SHOULD ALLOW US TO WIN WISCONSIN

      Except it won’t, because you already need to show your ID to vote in Wisconsin. The referendum was only to put it in the state’s constitution, so it can’t easily be undone.

      To be even more clear, EVERYBODY that voted in yesterdays election NEEDED to show their ID.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s been part of WI state law for a while. Putting it in the state constitution makes it harder to repeal.

        This is one of those things that needs some context. Lots of nations have ID requirements similar to this, and people from outside the United States are often confused as to why it’s a problem. The issue is that it’s a backdoor to voter disenfranchisement.

        Not everyone drives, and therefore, doesn’t need a state-issued ID. But now you need one to vote. So you have to go to the DMV to get an ID that’s not a drivers license but functions the same way for ID purposes. Except the DMV is only open during working hours, has long lines, and the nearest one may not have public transportation going to it.

        It’s often minorities who don’t have drivers licenses to begin with, and they tend to vote for Democrats.

        In practice, there was never significant voter fraud at all. Not enough to change the outcome of any race. Even on the surface, it’s solving a non-problem.

        • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Why would you need to go to the Department of Motor Vehicles for an ID though? For a driver’s license I can somewhat understand but that should be the extent of their responsibilities.

          Over here you go to your local registration office which basically every town has? It’s the same office for registering where you live (which you are also legally required to do) - meaning there are more than enough of them around. For smaller towns they are usually located in town halls, larger cities have many of them spread around.

          Honestly, you’d easily get significant adaption of IDs by just mandating them for everything. Want a bank account? Need an ID. Want to get a job? Need an ID. Want to get a driver’s license? Need an ID. Are you older than 16? Believe it or not, need an ID.

          If (nearly) everyone has an ID, it cannot be used as means for voter disenfranchisment.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Why would you need to go to the Department of Motor Vehicles for an ID though?

            Well, now you’re seeing the issue. You go to the DMV because that’s the only place allowed to give out state IDs. This is not an accident.

            If (nearly) everyone has an ID, it cannot be used as means for voter disenfranchisment.

            You’re forgetting that the entire point is to be disenfranchising. Yes, this is 100% fixable, and Republicans will fight to make sure it doesn’t get fixed.

    • alkbch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      Voter ID laws shouldn’t be controversial, they are enacted in most democracies.

      • 10001110101@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 days ago

        It disenfranchises many voters. I know several people who don’t have valid IDs. I was almost unable to to vote last November because my ID expired, and all my local DMVs were booked for many months. Had to set an appointment 3 months in the future at a DMV 50 miles away from me to get an ID just before the election.

        • Bristingr@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I still can’t get my California ID because of how much the DMV is giving me the runaround. At this point, I just keep my WA ID and said fuck it.

        • alkbch@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          In many cases you can renew an ID online or by mail; if you can’t, there’s always the option to just show up at the DMV, you don’t have to have an appointment.

          • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            Your solution is to just spend an entire day at the DMV and hope you get seen so you don’t have to do it again the next day? In what world does that sound reasonable?

              • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                1 day ago

                Well I don’t have time in my life to spend an entire day at the DMV. And I don’t find that to be a reasonable expectation. So, not here.

                I’ve had to pay late registration penalties due my vehicles before under the same circumstances. Walk in, 150 people in line, walk out.

                • alkbch@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Why don’t you renew your vehicle registration online or by mail?

          • 10001110101@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I could not renew online (not sure why it wouldn’t let me). You need an appointment in my state now. Before this change, it was an all-day affair. I.e. get there before it opens, stand in an extremely long line that wraps around all 3 sides of the building, and stand in line for most the day (in the extreme heat, in the summer).

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            And if you don’t have a home address then you don’t deserve to vote?

            Remember when we decided to not let just land owners vote?

      • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 days ago

        Both true and not true.

        The idea that you have to register to vote is not normal in most democracies.

        For example, in the Netherlands you have to carry ID at all times, whether you are voting or just going for a walk. You don’t have to register to vote, you just get mail a while before the election with a paper that you take to the voting booth, which is usually a few minutes walk away.

        Such a system prevents fraud (which is already a non-issue in the USA, even with its confusing and difficult system), and also makes it easy for as many people to vote.

        The goal of voter ID laws is to provide ways to disenfranchise people, by making things slightly harder and create plausible points to not count some ballots.

        • Damage@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Here in Italy we have “electoral cards” which are issued once every so many years and get reissued when expired or when you move. You need that AND your ID to vote.

          Nobody makes a fuss. Just have to be an adult and remember to check if you lost yours sometime before you have to vote. Seems like a good minimum requirement for voting, being able to hold on a piece of paper.

        • Willy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          in the Netherlands you have to carry ID at all times, whether you are voting or just going for a walk

          That’s pretty disgusting. Are you sure though? Some Americans think this about America too. If true, why not just tattoo subtle ids on people or force facial/other recognition and fingerprinting and iris scanning on everyone. What age do you have to start carrying id?

          • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah that struck me, too. Sounds very weird to an American. Realistically, having an ID on your happens most of the time, but if I didn’t have to drive, I’d leave my wallet home and just carry my phone all the time.

            • Willy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              You don’t even need a license on you to drive most places. You just need to be licensed. If you decide to id yourself they can just look your license up. My state has id on phone too though. You could see if yours does.

              • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                I didn’t know that was a thing. Looks like it’s a misdemeanor here to be sticking without tie license physically on you, but I’ll assume that will probably get updated at some point. Probably after I can’t drive any longer…

          • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            2 days ago

            It is! Some countries use a “permanent” ink to prevent voting twice, but yes, just let people vote.

            Let’s imagine one person one vote, but without voter ID. Now, one person can be 10 people…IF that one person wants to set the record for “easiest voter fraud conviction ever.”

            In-person election fraud isn’t a thing that statistically happens.

            However, requiring an ID does SUPPRESS turnout in countries that are deporting so quickly they sometimes accidently deport their own citizens and can’t get them back (true story bro).

            So you fixed a problem that doesn’t exist, but hurt poor and marginalized people. Sounds like a shitty idea.

            • alkbch@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              2 days ago

              Are you suggesting voter ID laws suppress turnout in most modern European democracies?

          • WuceBrillis@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            In my country i just get my vote-note in the mail. In America you now have to own a passport which most doesn’t, be a member of a party, which 90mil eligible voters aren’t, and hope that your boss has the same political views as you, so he lets you off work to go vote.

                • alkbch@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  In America you now have to own a passport which most doesn’t, be a member of a party, which 90mil eligible voters aren’t, and hope that your boss has the same political views as you, so he lets you off work to go vote.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          I have this user tagged.

          They got me banned from ml for calling them out because they were saying, “you have to give Trump credit for brokering peace in Gaza” a couple of weeks back.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Surely, a leftist used to studying intricate theory and picking apart the layers of capitalist control to see the rot at its center would be able to see why voter ID laws are a problem. I have it under great authority that .ml is filled with such users. Can’t think of any possible reason why they’d be for it. None at all.

          • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            2 days ago

            The fact that Trump is saying out loud that voter ID laws would “allow them to win all future elections” should give you a clue as to why not.

            Voter ID laws, at face value, are not the problem. The problem is that Republicans have made getting a valid ID damn near difficult in typically blue areas.

            Not only that, there are simply no cases of voter fraud in the US where a voter ID would have stopped said fraud. Voter Fraud, as it happens, is so rare that the only really effective way to commit fraud is by ballot stuffing which, surprise surprise, Republicans have consistently been caught doing.

            • alkbch@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              2 days ago

              I don’t really care what Trump says. Most modern democracies have voter ID laws, that is the sensible thing to do. It is difficult to prove that voter fraud doesn’t happen, are you saying people just haven’t been caught? You shouldn’t be able to vote as someone else just because you know their name and their address.

              Of course, we should also prevent ballot stuffing.

              • redhat421@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                It’s a solution to a problem which doesn’t exist.

                Implementing Republican voter suppression laws is not sensible.

      • boreengreen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        How much for a passport in the US? What’s the expiry time?

        Are there any goverment workers left, that can issue them?

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Bout $80 and a decade

          ETA: its also a massive pain in the ass that most people don’t do at best. And some groups are having a harder and harder time getting one.

          If a passport is accessible to you, get one, they’re great and practical. But in the US voter ID is a voter suppression tactic. Personally I would much prefer a universal “citizen/permanent resident ID” that’s free, easily obtained, and can serve as a motor vehicle license and short form passport, but we aren’t there, that ain’t happening, and I don’t trust the current administration to do it without forcing minority status on it and forcing minorities to carry it everywhere

      • ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        In a place as polarized and corrupt as the US, Voter ID is merely a tool to keep Red or Blue in power. Tomfoolery involving the invalidation of a side’s enemies’ IDs is near certain.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Including Wisconsin. It’s been the law for over a decade. This just put it in the *constitution, for some damn fool reason.

        ETA: Interesting story. We had a whistleblower testify in court that the legislators who created the law intended for it to suppress voter turnout.

        • drthunder@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          One of our congresspeople (iirc) bragged about it suppressing enough votes to give the state to Trump in 2016 too.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Maybe you don’t remember because you didn’t speak English yet, but this is something that we figured out like 20 years ago.

        Do like 5 minutes of actual research.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I think my comment was very clear.

            There’s a shit ton of information on Voter ID laws, most of it from like a decade ago when Republicans themselves were openly admitting that they were pushing it in order to disenfranchise “certain groups”.

            It’s just so fucking dumb that, in 2025, people are pretending to not know the purpose of these laws.

            • alkbch@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              No, your comment was not clear.

              The goal of voter ID laws is not the disenfranchise certain groups, it is to help prevent voter fraud.