cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/22423685

EDIT: For those who are too lazy to click the link, this is what it says

Hello,

Sad news for everyone. YouTube/Google has patched the latest workaround that we had in order to restore the video playback functionality.

Right now we have no other solutions/fixes. You may be able to get Invidious working on residential IP addresses (like at home) but on datacenter IP addresses Invidious won’t work anymore.

If you are interested to install Invidious at home, we remind you that we have a guide for that here: https://docs.invidious.io/installation/..

This is not the death of this project. We will still try to find new solutions, but this might take time, months probably.

I have updated the public instance list in order to reflect on the working public instances: https://instances.invidious.io. Please don’t abuse them since the number is really low.

Feel free to discuss this politely on Matrix or IRC.

  • Nima@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    i absolutely despise youtube. these fuckers are putting ads on paused videos now, and then this.

    they will never get better. only worse. we need regulations badly.

        • hostops@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Competitor with no content, users is not a competitor. Youtube should be forced to share content they do not own. Just for the sake of competition.

          • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            The content isn’t the problem. It’s the delivery system. No one else has the storage and network capacity that Youtube has. And as a result of that, no one else has the built-in audience Youtube has. Putting your videos on YT is simply the best way to get views.

        • ‮redirtSdeR@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I’d like to move to PeerTube, but I mostly just post stupid memes, and game clips on my YouTube. And as generic as that is I don’t really know what instance to go with. Most instances seem to either focus on tech, or education. And that’s good to have but I want a more general instance from a uploader pov.

            • Cistello@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Pretty much every Alternative Tech platform also has a huge far right population Lemmy is an exception to this but has a decently sized far left population instead I dunno how it is now but a lot of people complained a couple of weeks ago about Nazis joining Bluesky and one of the guys from Bluesky covering them

              • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                that’s true, but platforms like rumble were created to be homes to the far right. we shouldn’t encourage their existence.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Paying Nebula subscriber here 🙋‍♂️

        Pony up or your call for a competitor doesn’t mean anything. People don’t want ads? Fine. There has to be another revenue stream. Server capacity costs money, making a website and app cost money, and video creators need to eat.

          • scarabic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I also do that. But Nebula is more thoroughly creator friendly. 50% of net profits go to creators and are divided by their share of watch time. That is a far more creator friendly policy than YT having a closed ad algorithm and you just get what you get. The YT display algorithm is also famously opaque and has some bullshit nanny filters on it such that you can’t actually make a faithful video about something like a historical massacre without being demonetized and hurting your channel in the algo.

            There’s a lot I like about YT and being a premium subscriber does benefit creators there but I think Nebula is a next step in that evolution and it’s off to a decent start.

            I pay for both.

      • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Works for Albania.

        Its not like google fucking earned that money anyways. You don’t earn billions of dollars.

        Think about it. If you earned a million dollars a year, you’d be set for life. If you lived for a full hundred years you’d have only made 1/10th of a billion dollars. Despite the fact that its still more money than either of us will probably ever see.

        The people who operate google have billions with an s at the end. Think about the hardest working person you’ve known. Think about how little money they made.

        Now ask yourself, what did the people with billions do to earn that money? How hard did they have to work to justify it, and how is that level of work even humanly possible? How would a bunch of spoiled overgrown trustfund fratboys find it in themselves do that work?

        They fucking don’t. The only people who get that rich do it by cheating, and stealing, and fucking people over. Those fuckers owe us a lot more than video streaming services.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’ll never get upvotes for telling people this reality, but you are of course completely correct.

        If only we saw as much enthusiasm for voting generally as we see for taking ads off YT. Maybe we’d actually get a government that was willing to regulate titans.

  • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    You can still watch YouTube without ads using grayjay.app including sponsor block.

    Thanks to Louis Rossman

      • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Sure, that works too, however with grayjay you can follow creaters across platforms. So in case someone’s account gets banned by YouTube due to whatever bullshit reason, you can continue following them on other platforms. Next to that you won’t get spammed with Shorts junk. If you want to download a video to watch it offline, you can actually watch it offline (you don’t require a connection like with YouTube to watch something offline)

      • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        But ur data gets raped if u don’t use a VPN + no account (but then u don’t get to see age restricted material)

    • brrt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      And how are they going to make a living to keep producing videos?

      I’d say ask them to join Nebula.

      • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        They can still post on YouTube.

        It might take a tiny bit of their revenue away but I doubt it would make much of a dent, especially for creators that run mostly on patreon anyway.

      • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        That depends. If they only make a living with YT ads, then it’s going to be hard.

        • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          About half the ads I see on YouTube are already within the videos they post. I wonder what the overall ratio is of YouTube ad revenue versus in-video ad revenue.

        • brrt@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I guess I forgot things like Patreon which could be a valid option. Although I’m neither a fan of subscribing to specific creators nor am I particularly fond of Patreon.

          With Nebula my perception is that I pay a monthly fee and they can figure out who gets what depending on whose videos I watched. I don’t need to be particular in my action on who to support.

          • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Nebula is a good option, but now you’ve created a paywall. Now only people who can afford it, can watch the content and what is to keep Nebula from upping the price of the subscription?

            If ads is out of the question, then content creators need to use sponsors and patrons, if they want to make a living.

            • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              An advantage of funding things via a collective like Nebula as opposed to each individual creator managing their own patrons is that new creators can start making bigger, more expensive projects quicker. Even established creators have this advantage, they can take bigger risks on bigger projects with the safety net of a share of the nebula pie.

            • scarabic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              People want a fantasy world where all the main content is free and two or three rich sponsors support the creator by sponsoring little extras only available to Patreon supporters. The ends will never meet in the middle on that. It’s a fantasy where people get what they want for free because someone else pays for it. Won’t work. Get out your cash, kids. Cancel your Netflix and put the money into Nebula.

              • borgertwo@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Don’t shift the blame on “people wants” as if they’re owed by the people. Most people dont even ask for whatever content that is pushed out. And what’s more content creator is just a glorified term for online digital panhandlers. And they frame it as if viewers are meant to owe them something all while contributing as little to their efforts that amounts to no significance as possible. Imagine paying someone to make a facial reaction and talking for a bit everytime you passed a panhandler and they call themselves a content creator. It’s bogus way to frame or even justify that especially considering they get payed far larger sums comparison to people who actully work for a living while dodging the taxes. And is unlikely any such platform as youtube as well as its big panhandlers are struggling with finances. Youtube gets $15 billion dollars a year in ad revenue and hey greedily continue the push for more ads. And the digital panhandlers calling themselves content creators can make more money in a week than the typical wage slave can in a year.

      • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        What is the alternative name for someone who creates content for a platform?

        • ElectricMachman@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Well, we start by referring ta work not as “content”, but as what it actually is. Then work from there. For instance, one could ostensibly call Ahoy a filmmaker or a documentary maker.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            … Which is a type of content.

            There’s a lot of content that doesn’t fit neatly into a category though, because it was made by someone turning on a camera and making a video without worrying about any commercial concerns. So calling someone like that a creator is a catch all term for anyone making content for a platform.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            So what should we say when discussing people who make video, audio, text media?

            I see their point about “content”, where, on YouTube, for example, it devalues the videos as subordinate to YouTube as a platform, but I think as people use the word “content” it loses that connotation.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            That’s pretty insulting, a lot of what YouTube creators do takes real skill, and it’s a full time job for many.

            • borgertwo@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              In the past maybe, but certainly not these days. It’s overglorified corporate money grab propaganda, that goes around shamelessy guilt tripping viewers when truth is spoken. Much of these so-called content creators do not much else than making face react videos to something they saw and just talk about their likes or dislikes. They get paid lots just to make a soy-jack face and shitty clickbaits. The amount of money some them get paid is large sums insane for little efforts in proportion to what worth it actually ought to be. There people out there putting real efforts and labor to contributions to society to keep it running that paid squat in comparison. Its sad really. Go ahead downvote me, it doesn’t change the truth i speak.

        • ElectricMachman@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          To answer the “why”, it’s because the word “content” is kinda meaningless. Instead of making films, documentaries, talk shows, reference guides, cartoons… it’s all just this generic “content” slop that’s just there to feed the machine

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Not all content is entertaining. Someone who makes tutorials I wouldn’t call an entertainer. That’s why “content creator” is used as a catch all term to cover all of it.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Showman/woman refers to a pretty specific type of performer, I.E someone who is on stage typically.

            Entertainer isn’t a label I’d necessarily apply to educational content, for example.

              • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                What do you have against creators as a label? I don’t really see these difference myself.

              • Tja@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Yes it’s much better to use

                “comedians/teachers/musicians/educators/entertianers/phonereviewers/sportscommenters/singers/journalists/programmers/documenters/analysts/lawyers/lockpickers/politicians/presenters/trolls”

                … than…

                “content creators”.

              • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Or just call them Content creators, recognize they don’t really produce value for anyone but YT’s grab on the attention economy and start living in the real world.

  • IcePee@lemmy.beru.co
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I wonder if some kind of mesh might work. Maybe like a secret Santa type deal. By that I mean everyone who connects, gets a randomised, anonymous partner or partners. Everyone in the swarm streams for each other.

  • sga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    For those who are want something similar to invidious, you can try youtube-local (not my project, I am just a user). It is a minimal python youtube client, and functions similar to other frontends, but runs locally. You lose some amount of privacy (youtube still has a general idea of who is watching with IPs), but it is not very exact, and there is an option to use tor to get the content. You can also enable sponsorblock, or hide yt-shorts.

  • Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    newpiped and freetube will continue to work but piped is also blocked as well

  • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Not just invidious, they’ve just de facto blocked video embedding:

    If you’re wondering how a viable competitor could arise, other companies needing a video hosting solution that they can rely on to run their storefronts is a perfect use case. This is the Humble Bundle storefront, and they could pretty easily spin up a peertube instance. If that became commonplace, it could be one way for peertube to become ubiquitous.

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Could be, maybe it’s intermittent, but the more times they try to lock this shit down and it stops working for storefronts, the more unreliable it becomes.

        What percentage of visits can they afford to have this error happen before they seek alternatives? If it were my business and I didn’t know how many customers were closing the store page because the video didn’t play and they lost interest, I would be immediately looking for an alternative.

    • Mwa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      yo rainworld i used to have a friend that was a fan of that game

  • hollyberries@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Right now we have no other solutions/fixes. You may be able to get Invidious working on residential IP addresses (like at home) but on datacenter IP addresses Invidious won’t work anymore.

    This might explain why mine has been reliable even though it hasn’t been updated in months. I guess add me to the list of confirmations that it works on residential connections.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    YouTube will not change until people stop using it. And people do not want to put up with the inconvenience of not having a YouTube type service again for the amount of time it would take for YouTube to change or a viable competitor to take their place, it really is that simple.

    Are YouTube and Google terrible? For sure, but it only got this way because the only backstop to holding them accountable, the consumer, has proven that they will choose putting up with shitty products and services in the name of convenience 9 times out of 10.

    Same reasons that ad tiers are gaining a foothold in streaming services like Netflix. The consumer has shown they are fine with it.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Time to pirate YT content and upload to usenet to be automatically downloaded using sonarr

      • Gutless2615@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes but literally throwing together a script to download the days subscription videos to a jellyfin media drive would be stupidly simple.

    • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Same reasons that ad tiers are gaining a foothold in streaming services like Netflix. The consumer has shown they are fine with it.

      Yep, I remember when Netlfix first put it out there that they would start with the ads, and everyone on reddit was like, “Canceling my Netflix right now!!”

      Netflix is doing just fine without the 5 redditors who actually did cancel it. lmao

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        the problem is so many people are willing to say they’ll take a stand.

        but when the time comes, the mindnumbingly overwhelming majority suck it up, because they must have their precious shiny and can not suffer even the mildest of inconvenience.

        Its my biggest gripe in gaming, but its a enormous gripe just in general, with everything. because it doesnt matter if you are talking about appliances, creative software, video games, streaming services, stores, etc.

  • zlatiah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The elites don’t want you to know but “[y]ou may be able to get Invidious working on residential IP addresses (like at home)”

    Following their guide gives a local Invidious client, don’t forget to 1) copy their production compose file instead of using the one on git and 2) change “hmac_key”… from my experience setting up cron (crontab -e) to restart the docker container once per day keeps the Invidious docker healthy

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      If you do this, I would be fully prepared to lose access to all your Google services along with anyone else who may use Google services on the same IP. Gmail, Play store, Chrome, etc, etc can easily be wiped out with a ban from Google and this can seriously fuck people’s day up if they’ve used Gmail and have 2FA setup on any external account.

      • zlatiah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I guess I forgot to take that into consideration… I’m not worried about Google banning my IP since I essentially don’t use any Google services at all and my home IP is hidden behind a wireguard tunnel, but yes that is a valid concern

        But I mean someone can just spin it up on their home network so… No way 192.168.0.1:3000 can get someone into trouble right

        • curry@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Like any other web services, Google can see the public ip your personal invidious instance is using to access youtube servers. The local 192.168.x.x ip are for internal access.

  • Engywuck@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    People should learn to live without YT, instead of making an existential drama about it (about its ads, really).

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is the way. Let those content creators sucking up your time be the background noise they were always meant to be.

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I have a BSc in CompSci and an MSc in Cybersec & Dig. Forensics and I’m actively employed as a mid level engineer in the field on a fully employer-sponsored Skilled Worker Visa, doing everything from vulnerability management and triage to GRC for ISO27001 to advising product and engineering teams on implementation details for best practices and compliance for a multinational org to DR&BC tabletops etc etc. I think this counts as IT.

          Perhaps even more impressively though: I use Vim btw (to program in C).

          I am not necessarily trying to brag very much, only to establish my own perspective, I don’t consider myself particularly talented or intelligent or successful - otherwise I’d have gone into research, but I am currently (and kinda always) studying to improve my skills and stay up to date.

          Just recently I decided to take a look into pentesting to learn the l33t side of things more, I started in August as something to keep my brain sane during studies for the settlement visa (Life in the UK) test, and I’ve made it to Hacker Rank on HackTheBox a week ago or so. I think I watched a grand total of one Ippsec video, the rest of everything I read.

          I don’t know where you got the “game show hosts” from my comment, and I’m not aware of this if it exists as some broader trend. I don’t see YouTube shorts it’s all long blocked for me since release haha.

          Yes YT tutorials and whatnot are good, but they are only good as broad introductions to a topic, personal opinions, or a particular historical narrative (Dr.Chuck on C’s history for instance). Those are few good nuggets between an endless sea of scams selling you a course or some other grift.

          At a certain point you should start going a bit more in depth and reading - actively engaging with the material, move beyond simply knowing or purely copying and pasting terminal commands and understand why things work the way they do.

          You don’t become an electrical engineer or something by watching electroboom, you learn what it’s about yes, but the rest you learn by reading and making, even basic arduino projects will teach you more.

          The best thing about YouTube is how good it is as background noise.

        • uhmbah@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          25 years in IT and I didnt need youtube.

          BUT, I prefer learning by reading, not videos.

  • Fijxu@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    If you have the resources, host your own to help and spread the load across public instances.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      They said:

      You may be able to get Invidious working on residential IP addresses (like at home) but on datacenter IP addresses Invidious won’t work anymore.

      and I imagine that most people that host something like this do so using a VPS. Homelabs tend to be the minority use case.

      • irreticent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Plus, some ISPs might frown upon the increase in traffic when hosting a public service.

        I hate my ISP.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Plus, some ISPs might frown upon the increase in traffic when hosting a public service.

          this shit is so stupid, i pay for the fucking bandwidth, give me the fucking bandwidth.

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Wow all this bullying is really convincing me to go back to their shitty platform.

    If i can’t access my fav creators anymore itl just motivate me to do sm productive, like building web3