It runs fast more efficiently so you didn’t need to burn down a forest to get your question answered

Is this true?

Nah you’re right but I do love to see it

Now THAT’s what I call PRAXIS

I generally am, and I get that people might not understand that it’s a reference to a known quote (which doesn’t make it automatically ok, even if it is), it’s annoying that I get this mistake permanently associated with my account in the modlog without any recourse. I wish I could have had the opportunity to correct it instead.

I’m repeating a Simpsons meme, not addressing this person in any way.

2_real

Removed by mod

For those who didn’t see it, Hasan toured the JCP last week

It wasn’t super interesting, but I’d say it was very mildly interesting.

Honestly, I’m not as cool as some of you who are down to go on adventure, even if it includes sitting in jail, it’s just not something that’s in the books for me.

Going to jail for this would be the funniest thing ever though, take me away coppers 🚓🚓

What did he say about it?

Check out a floor plan for air force 1

They probably think it appears “balanced” lol

You think it’s worse than the Astros a couple years back?

How did they cheat?

What fools, you’ve had weeks to prepare

They aren’t mutually exclusive at all. In fact they are additive, aviation is actually very safe if you don’t maximize profit.

Another factor that adds to those two is that the airport is operating over-capacity. The incident flight was only on the path it was on because it had to be rerouted last minute due to some “bunching” with the other landing planes. Fewer flights = much lower risk of getting jammed up = no redirects.

Another additive factor is that because of the “redirect”, the flight crew is no longer on their planned flight plan in, but they are actively flying the plane to divert to a different runway. In itself, there’s nothing unsafe about it. They agreed to it with ATC (who may have said “can’t safely divert and land? Ok you have to go-around.”). At the same time, it’s a situation where they are operating at a higher capacity than if they were on a more routine landing, which is that much lower of a chance that they will avert the collision.

You have a lot of really cool resources here comrade, but I’m not sure if I’ll have the time to browse them. Would it be possible for you to summarize some of the oddities of this case? Assume I’m not very familiar with “rationalism” (I guess I see people here talking about it, but it’s not the kind of thread I usually browse)

Never discuss “the middle class”. It’s not materialist and whatever discussion centers upon it will lead nowhere useful.

Hmm I’ve reported stuff but haven’t seen confirmation