Here is a reddit post by a marshal riding in one of the trucks. It includes an update with a link to a response (on Twitter, sorry) from the owner and the marshal’s response to it.

Does ublock do this?

I thought it was that the guest in room one was doing some weird diaper/puppet sex shit and the prospective guest was no longer interested in the room.

But maybe that’s a me problem.

Even ignoring the tires interacting with the road, you have air molecules. I don’t think that would be enough to destroy a continent, but it would be very destructive.

Here is a cool What If? from xkcd about throwing a baseball at 0.9c.

I’ll do what I can but I can’t stop the zoomers from listening to Rogan any more than I could stop the boomers from listening to Limbaugh.

And better science refuted their junk science. What’s your point?

Years ago, before creditkarma, Fico scores and credit reports in my Amex app, and vantage scores and reports in my chase app, back when you had to go to annualcreditreport.com and wait for your shit in snail mail: I went to Fry’s for a TV. They had some percentage off for applying for a store card. I was denied, which freaked me out because I thought my credit was really good so I assumed identity theft fucking my shit up. I paid with my normal card (still got the discount for applying), went to annualcreditreport, and waited; only to find out everything was fine.

I did some research and found out the industry considered me a “deadbeat.” Not because I didn’t pay, but because I did. I was the type of person that would get all these signup benefits and pay things off on time so I never got hit with all those retroactive usurious interest charges. I was rejected for having good credit.

The fact that it’s legal to purposely extend credit to people who can’t afford it to trap them in debt slavery is fucked up.

If that was remotely true half of lemmy would be in gitmo by now.

Whoever is in charge of writing this simulation is just getting lazy.

Musk and Vivek haven’t learned the lesson yet. Trump can do whatever he wants, but he can’t say whatever he wants.

The few times Trump has been booed by the faithful is when he’s deviated from the MAGA dogma. You can import all the workers you want, but you have to say you’re deporting everyone. As long as Trump claims he’s rounding up all the immigrants and getting rid of them if you try to confront MAGATs with doubling H1B visa numbers they’ll scream “fake news”, no matter how much evidnece they’re shown.

These people are stupid, but they need to be pandered to.

Over $1/oz is expensive. The bougie shit I buy rarely goes over $2/oz and the cheap stuff (still real cheese, not crap like Velveeta or Kraft singles) is $0.25-0.30/oz, and on sale even cheaper.

https://www.pavilions.com/shop/search-results.html?q=cheese&sort=bestmatch

I just read this after opening my Christmas present from my mother-in-law. It’s one of those pounding massage guns. I love it for it’s legitimate uses but I’m also considering off-label applications.

I asked that when it happened to me. “Boofed the Apple” was nominated, seconded, and carried. It is now official.

You boofed the apple.

I’ve always liked that one. On a scale of fanny to gash, how impolite is it considered over there?

Don’t worry, you agree with her words but not her intent. She doesn’t actually want to do it, she just wants to use the threat of it to keep Gaetz’s report secret.

It’s three hours of someone almost, but not quite, removing a splinter.

Couple things I’ve tried to watch recently that I couldn’t find anywhere. I was even willing to buy it (streaming, maybe they’re available on physical media).

Basketball Diaries

Less Than Zero

Very annoying.

A “yes” vote means no slavery. See my comment in reply to lanik2000.

I think you’re misunderstanding them.

A “yes” vote means no slavery. This was a prop to make forced prison labor illegal. Our voter guides contain arguments for and against propositions and rebuttals to those arguments, usually. No group even bothered to make an argument against the prop or a rebuttal to the argument for. They’re also saying, in general not just this prop, if no one can even be bothered to make an argument for one side, they’ll probably go with the only side that did make one. In this case that would be no slavery.

This was weird. There are always arguments both ways unless it’s just some editorial change to some law that for whatever reason has to go before the voters. This was totally non-controversial, or at least it seemed that way. I don’t understand how it didn’t pass.

I’ve only heard that applied to foreign diplomats. Because the parents have diplomatic immunity, they and their children aren’t “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”