This is amusing to me because we have the “20ct guy” in my city who always claims he only needs 20ct and as soon as he sees any more money he’ll steal it from you.

Isn’t “I” considered poor form? I was taught to always write in passive but “we” is kind of the accepted exception.

The 2nd referee will nonetheless tell you to get rid of all of them

Iirc, yed

I still remember trying to find the space group for Copper Telluride. No amount of technical terms could help me there.

Hot take: a McChicken isn’t a basic good.

Haven’t we already confirmed ignition?

Not that I know of. You can obviously just neglect most energy costs when considering “ignition” and the proclaim you’ve achieved ignition. These may legitimately be significant advances but it doesn’t mean we’re ready to start thinking about actually sustaining fusion energy at scale.

Archaeology -> people, Paleontology -> non people

Both are about digging old stuff out of the ground (sometimes)

Source: not an archaeologist, but I was told so by other people who are also not archaeologists

My colleague has had problems with his camera. He bought a new cable, started cooling the camera, reinstalled drivers, reinstalled the entire measuring software, anything half-reasonable you can think of.

Well last week he was sick and another colleague took over his experiments. Turns out the camera works just fine on the 2nd monitor.

We still have no idea why.

The more I read the funnier it becomes. The density dysfunctional calculations absolutely killed me