Cuba is most certainly not a settler country, it like Haiti was a slave society ruled by settlers, not a settler society with slavery, then it became a colony of the US; settler colonialism is a demographic land acquisition project, where population proportions become the metric of political development, its success relies on the proportions between demographics that make up it’s caste system, which is why settler colonialism failed in Southern Africa while it endured in Australia and North America and that is the crucial difference between the settler colonialism of the Anglosphere and Latin America, the Caribbean, and other European colonies (where religious confessionalism and late imperialist extraction was more important than Pan-European identification and land theft)

Also Australia is a special case precisely because the demographic proportions were so out of whack, the aboriginal people had nearly been wiped out, and their numbers were too small to trigger the class-collaborationist defense mechanism among settlers living in southern Australia (far from the reservations), so during the post-war period tensions between working class settlers and elites settlers began to boil over as there was no racial release valve to vent the pressure of class struggle, since the 70s however with the arrival of POC immigrants, that settler mechanism has kicked in and class-collaborationism among settlers defines the modern political system

The way American leftists talk about their how settler-nations are incapable of having genuine revolutionary activity

That is a ludicrous strawman and is not an opinion anyone has ever held, the theory is pretty simple, settler colonialism generates a class collaborationist solidarity between capitalist and working class settlers centered on racialized identity politics (that is an historical fact) revolution in settler nations is possible, 1776 and Rhodesia 1965 proves that, but it’s the fact they generate counter-revolutions more often than marxist revolutions that is the theory’s crux, and again (that is an historical fact)

Marxism cannot function without working class solidarity and settler colonialism is specifically designed to negate solidarity thru racialized solidarity among settlers, and it works, which is why settler nations are the most viciously anti-marxist bulwarks on earth

Doesn’t mean Marxism is impossible in settler countries, simply means Marxists have to negate the negation, and to start doing that they have to first acknowledge the negation exists in the first place, basic materialism

The media in Britain is far more sophisticated than the cucklefuck nonsense that passes as rhetoric in the US, class is actually a concept in British media

for the fact that the war against organisations of the working class in the USA was more succesfull.

The question is why was it so successful, and the answer is settler solidarity does not abide non-settler working class solidarity

On the contrary they’re positively giddy with anticipation, they believe everyone sent to those camps axiomatically deserves it because Kamala didn’t win

They’re cheering it on right along side the Trumpers

That’s an interesting contrast to the new polls out of the US

American media gives the impression of the public being far more progressive than it actually is

British media on the otherhand gives the impression of the public being far more conservative than it actually is

But the most interesting element is the proportion of white people; 76% UK vs 62% US, in other words further confirmation of the unique class character of settler colonialism and it’s vicious inherent drive toward fascism

Sakai was correct and leftists need to stop being shocked at cross-class settler solidarity

It’s not really a matter of it being viable, it’s more the US will try it anyway until the shocks become too great to ignore

Alot of damage can be done in the mean time

That is fuckin perverse, even for a comprador regime

Getting mad at the Kendrick Revolutionary Vanguard which DEFINITELY exists

I think the Russians are gonna call Trump’s bluff, they’ve been burnt too many times to take proposals by the Americans seriously and the manpower and equipment they’ve lost is too great to settle on a freeze of the current battle lines, it’s all of Donbass or its nothing

In coming months liberals are gonna display a form of cognitive dissonance never before seen, when Trump’s “bluff” of sanctioning every single company on earth that does business with Russia becomes a reality and they can’t triangulate anymore as the premier anti-russian faction

The proof lies in three facts; the Americans were willing to scutter crucial ideological scaffolding like USAID (which speaks to significant ideological derangement in the Trump regime)

Second, the Europeans and their two-minded Russophobic mania which applies out-of-proportion pressure to the middle strata of American bureaucracy to replicate that mania; despite the fact it will lead to the US capturing Europe’s industrial base

And third the personal element of Trump being told by Putin to eat dirt, with liberals adding fuel to fire by insulting his seeming impotence

Bunch of yapping Euro bureaucrats acting like they’re gonna challenge the US empire lmao

How very 2004

Be a racist in a world of racists

Didn’t Bernie even vote for Marco Rubio?

Liberals have substituted opposition for schadenfreude (most of it expressed thru classism) and identity politics for identity schadenfreude or more commonly known as; racism

How they expect to maintain a cross-class and cross-demographic electoral coalition with this disgusting nonsense is genuinely a mystery

If any of that was remotely true, every poor person on earth would be a communist, obviously that’s not the case

If the theory of anti-theory is not true in practice then of what use is the theory?

The whole plot line about the Templars from Assassin’s Creed inventing capitalism

But no, there was no collapse of state capacity or a massive population crash, it was just evolution and continuity

Inside me are two wolves

I’m a convinced doomer for the west and MENA, but an excited bloomer for China and large parts of the global south

California produces 80% of US wines and Canadian imports of US beers in 2022 amounted to a measly $79 million

Literally only the Bourbon industry (majority produced in Kentucky) is gonna be effected