The measure, called Question 3, prompted heated debate in the months leading up to the election. Central Maine Power and Versant Power, the state’s dominant utilities, poured more than $40 million into a campaign opposing the referendum, outspending Pine Tree Power advocates 34 to 1. Political groups funded by the utilities and their parent companies mailed flyers and aired ads on TV, radio, and social media, urging Mainers to reject the measure, which would have effectively put the two companies out of business.

  • SpiderFarmer [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Similar attempts have been made in my State to oust the private company in control of of energy, that does nothing but raise rates and lobby against anyone installing solar panels. There’s been some radio silence after the last round of attempts.

  • charly4994 [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reminds me of when patient ratios for nurses in I believe Vermont went to a ballot measure and after a massive ad campaign it barely failed. Not like the public really understands what it’s like and what’s cut when you’re understaffed and the slick ads tell them that it’ll make things worse so they believe it. Then you get national professional organizations celebrating the defeat because they’re all ghouls and don’t give a shit about the floor nurse burning out after running with an 8:1 in med surg or 24:1 at rehab where you have 20 minutes to allot each person, good luck actually giving people proper care.

    • Yiazmat@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      there was a bill in California last year that would have required dialysis clinics to have a doctor/nurse/PA present during patient treatments, and they would have to get permission from the state’s department of health before they could close clinics or reduce patient services, among other things like having to provide the state with a list of people who had more than 5% ownership interest in the clinic. Of course private health companies like DaVita spent more than $75 million buying ads that were just thinly-veiled threats like “hey you love your family members with kidney disease, right? It would be a shame if we just closed all these clinics…” and so of course the bill failed with almost 70% of people voting no.

      idk how anyone can consider this country a democracy

  • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    funny how it takes a plebiscite the company is allowed to campaign in to create a public utility, but selling off a public utility never comes with a plebiscite?

  • Hohsia [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “We gave you a choice between a good thing and a bad thing. We may have sunk a lot of resources into the bad thing, but the beautiful part about it is that we gave you a choice unlike those authoritarian countries.”

    Fucking love democracy man

    • frogbellyratbone_ [e/em/eir, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      there’s a bunch of california local public owned for electricity https://www.cmua.org/members

      i’m pretty familiar with EBMUD and SMUD. Way cheaper electricity, cleaner, local better jobs compared to the poor neighboring souls still stuck on PG&E for electricity.

      i remember SMUD tried to expand into yolo county back in like 2009? and it was copy/paste same from this article with PG&E spending the world to stop it, successfully. those idiot voters got their wish (or more charitably: got manufactured) and have been getting fleeced hard since.

  • emizeko [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    poured more than $40 million into a campaign opposing the referendum, outspending Pine Tree Power advocates 34 to 1.

    boy that sure sounds democratic and not just bourgeois power

  • ArsenLupin [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    And that’s while living literally one step away from one of the best state own power utility in the OECD, providing the cheapest electricity of the “western” world. Americans are a lost cause. 🤦

  • foxodroid [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    On one hand I have an impulse to call the voters morons but it can’t be right, this level of propaganda is ungodly. What exactly does a power company’s propaganda even look like?

    • Dimmer06 [he/him,comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They put a large man in a hard hat and a flannel on TV and in a heavy Central Maine accent he said “Government run power is too expensive for us taxpayers”

      The voters also killed a constitutional amendment to remove a provision that was ruled illegal in federal court 20 years ago and hasn’t been enforced since.

      Edit: They actually voted against two constitutional amendments to bring our laws in line with federal law

    • Kestrel [comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      One of their arguments I believe was that it would actually be more expensive under public, because the cost of the buyout would be passed on to customers’ bills. That probably resonated even though the cost of the buyout was overinflated by them.