• GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If people just got over themselves and called it a comic book, that specific communication could at least be avoided, since there is absolutely no difference except that “graphic novels” want to be respected by a mainstream audience.

    Not even a knock on the author, the label is probably from the publisher.

    • NewAcctWhoDis [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      IMO “graphic novel” is a little more specific. Long-running superhero or manga series aren’t graphic novels, nor are newspaper comics.

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thing is, there are plenty of books that are called “comics” for various reasons, such as Maus, compilations of weekly publications of a non-strip serial (e.g. tankobons)*, and some other cases.

        *compare to how many classic novels, e.g. work by Charles Dickens, were initially published chapter-by-chapter but are now read as compilations. Many manga as well as western comics also get published this way (e.g. I have an old Daredevil book that was originally published on a monthly basis but reads just fine consecutively as a unified book)