• qjkxbmwvz@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Just curious — how would you like this to work? If you want high quality journalism, you need to pay journalists.

    You can pay them through ads, but 1) this is annoying, and 2) people just install ad blockers.

    You can have state-sponsored media, which can work reasonably well…or can end up a propaganda machine.

    Or…you can pay.

    Journalism is not a crazy lucrative career for most. Financially, most of the folks writing for NYT would be better off in PR — and I don’t think that’s a good thing for society.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      Or you can have voluntary sponsorship like NPR has done for decades and has high quality journalism because of it. Yes, they get a tiny bit of government money. Nowhere near enough to operate on. And they get corporate sponsors. Who they report against when they have a story about.

    • Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You need to earn my trust if you want me to pay.

      Many of these legacy media outlets are demanding Netflix-level fees for fanfic-level content.

      • wahming@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        The NYT is one of the biggest, most recognised publications worldwide. If they don’t meet your requirements, I don’t think that’s a realistic expectation

    • lemmyman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      As a paying NYT subscriber, I’d just like to add that unfortunately they still advertise to me.