Edit: The admins have told me if I don’t say this was an accident then they will remove the post.
It’s is verifiably an accident. It is also extremely convenient for the people she threatened.
Edit: The admins have told me if I don’t say this was an accident then they will remove the post.
It’s is verifiably an accident. It is also extremely convenient for the people she threatened.
Well they do have a motive to make it look natural, they’re still actively fishing for plausible deniability, they’re not going to go throwing people out of windows here. If she had a history of seizures, they without question knew it and could leverage it into unaliving her. The idea that she was resigned and no longer any kind of threat is naive, she could be in possession of a lot of damaging intel, given her activities.
I’m not saying this is definitively what happened, I’m just saying that dismissing it outright is probably too optimistic. Some consideration should be given to the fact that a) she was young, b) she went after Russian interests and c) she’s dead.
Even if they were to find something in the autopsy though, I doubt we will ever hear anything other than “natural causes” because America is fully a Russian vassal state.
You don’t need to use Newspeak to bypass filters here. It’s okay to say killing or murdering or assassinating
I didn’t use the word because I was trying to bypass filters. I like the word.
Plusgood, comrade, BB would be proud of you keeping your prolefeed clean of crimethink.
I’m literally saying the Russians had a reason to kill this woman and could have done so, but OK comrade.
I wasn’t commenting on that, just your advertising-algorithm-authorized Newspeak
No shit.
So why bring it up as a response?
Why not? Why do you feel compelled to apply peer pressure to make sure other users’ language conforms to that which you approve? Who can say.
Edit: perhaps I’m just going about this all wrong. Let me ask you: are you trying to help me? Do you think my life would be improved if I used the word “assassinate” in this context instead of “unalived?” Or is it just that it grates on your nerves so much to see people use terms that are commonly used to get around filters that you feel obliged to correct me so I won’t do it in the future, materially improving your life? Because this issue seems to be really important to you and I’d like this conversation to end amicably. Maybe you can convince me why it’s in my best interest to not use this word and words like it.