Edit: The admins have told me if I don’t say this was an accident then they will remove the post.

It’s is verifiably an accident. It is also extremely convenient for the people she threatened.

  • Glytch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    unaliving her.

    You don’t need to use Newspeak to bypass filters here. It’s okay to say killing or murdering or assassinating

      • Glytch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Plusgood, comrade, BB would be proud of you keeping your prolefeed clean of crimethink.

        • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m literally saying the Russians had a reason to kill this woman and could have done so, but OK comrade.

          • Glytch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            I wasn’t commenting on that, just your advertising-algorithm-authorized Newspeak

                • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  Why not? Why do you feel compelled to apply peer pressure to make sure other users’ language conforms to that which you approve? Who can say.

                  Edit: perhaps I’m just going about this all wrong. Let me ask you: are you trying to help me? Do you think my life would be improved if I used the word “assassinate” in this context instead of “unalived?” Or is it just that it grates on your nerves so much to see people use terms that are commonly used to get around filters that you feel obliged to correct me so I won’t do it in the future, materially improving your life? Because this issue seems to be really important to you and I’d like this conversation to end amicably. Maybe you can convince me why it’s in my best interest to not use this word and words like it.

                  • Glytch@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    It grates on my nerves because it’s a capitulation to capitalist censorship. The only reason “unalive” started gaining prominence is because YouTube and tiktok find mentions of death and killing distasteful and will demonetize and hide videos and channels that use those words. It just bothers me how sanitized online discourse is getting and “unalive” is a particularly childish version of that. A woman died, potentially by assassination, and you chose a cutesy weasel word to describe it, that rubbed me the wrong way.