Summary

The Atlantic has published unredacted attack plans (non-paywall link) shared in a Signal group chat of senior Trump officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and DNI Tulsi Gabbard.

Editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg released the full texts after officials denied sharing war plans or classified information, arguing transparency was necessary amid accusations of dishonesty.

The leaked messages detailed U.S. military strikes targeting Houthis in Yemen.

  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    So many people talking about the fact that this leaked, and not enough are talking about what leaked.

    We have political leaders throwing up fire emoji’s over dropping a building on a terrorist, with no regard for the, what, dozens? of innocent lives that were lost in the crossfire.

    If you have to kill someone, sure, that’s a moral position we can discuss. No one should ever be celebrating it, particularly when others died in the process. But hey, they’re not Americans, so they don’t count.

      • Glide@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        No one should be surprised. We’ve seen who these people are time and time again. But we shouldn’t be so desensitized to moral bankruptcy that we completely overlook such a disgusting disregard for human life.

    • Bouzou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s like the confirmation of Brett Kavenau when he threw a hissy fit about how he “likes beer”…

      That in and of itself should have disqualified him. If someone isn’t capable of being even-keeled and not throwing a temper tantrum, then they shouldn’t hold the highest judicial office in the land…

    • alkbch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      Since when do American leaders care about “collateral damage” ?

    • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      We’re talking about the same guys funded by the guy who says the ideal society is Mordor. This doesn’t surprise anyone. Everyone is expendable for the company’s machine, they wouldn’t mind targeting innocent people, let alone causing civilian casualties when targeting real terrorists.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      We have political leaders throwing up fire emoji’s over dropping a building on a terrorist, with no regard for the, what, dozens? of innocent lives that were lost in the crossfire.

      As someone who was around for “We’ll put a boot in yer ass, it’s the American way” this does not surprise me in the slightest.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      These dumbfucks have no empathy. They will tell you empathy is weakness. In reality empathy is a social defense mechanism. If we all have empathy for each other it limits the harm we do. What they’re missing is not having it isn’t some kind of advantage, historically we are the most savage to those without empathy. It causes the mob to turn their empathy off and give in to their worst impulses. They think they’ll be the first ones in history to avoid that fate. They won’t.

      • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Look at what JD “couch fucker” Vance wrote. Regarding potentially delaying the strike. He didn’t give any shits about the benefits or risks to lives, only the optics (oil prices going up), politics and his hatred for helping Europe.

        Sure, clearing the shipping lanes is “good” but it’s more helpful to Europe “gross” so that’s a tick “con” colum.

        Their “worst case scenarios” were all “it could look bad”.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      If you have to kill someone, sure, that’s a moral position we can discuss. No one should ever be celebrating it, particularly when others died in the process

      I can think of a few deaths worth celebrating

      • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        There are only a few handful for whom I’d pull the trigger myself, but quite a multitude more that I would celebrate their passing with glee.

    • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      “If we discussed dropping a building on a terrorist we should also discuss bombing weddings, so let’s stick to using proper communication channels and following proper protocol for records”

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      We have political leaders throwing up fire emoji’s over dropping a building on a terrorist, with no regard for the, what, dozens? of innocent lives that were lost in the crossfire.

      Correction: They dropped a building on a “terrorist” (read: brown person the US doesn’t like).