• S13Ni
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Comment was about as shallow as the article, so only fitting. It just listed same talkikg points, that are common in AI critique, didn’t even present those particularly well, didn’t bring anything new to the convo.

    I would had been all in on reading actually decent in depth AI critique.

    But this was just “top 10 talking points for AI haters we can hate together”. I’m a AI hater but I don’t want to read low quality junk media that just confirms my bias without nuance.

    • blakestacey@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      So sorry you wasted the five seconds it took to tell that the thing someone felt like sharing was not, in fact, the latest volume of the Oxbridge Handbook of Deep Analysis and Arguments for the Ages.

      • S13Ni
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Weird hill to die on, gn.

        • blakestacey@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          I’m not dying on a hill; I’m saying that you’re coming off as a pompous twit who will get themselves banned from the community the moment I or the other mods find your pompous twittery no longer amusing.

          Edit to add: Whoops! That already happened whilst I was typing the above. Enjoy your free trip to the egress.

          • S13Ni
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            criticize bad article, eveyone loses their shit