• Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Sorry, compromising photos and messages if we want to be pedantic. If you’re nit picking the nuance ls of the type of private content shared without someone’s consent you’ve already lost.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        intimate photos implies, sexting, which is, a crime, according to people here. So yes, the semantics do matter :)

        If you’re nit picking the nuance ls of the type of private content shared without someone’s consent you’ve already lost.

        that’s my problem though, i can’t tell you what it is. Was it bad for them to do that? Probably? Does my opinion of them change if it was harmless shitposting between friends, vs genuinely talking behind the backs of various people for no discernable reason. Yes. But we don’t know that.

        Unfortunately I am not god, and do not make the rules, so i cannot control what justice is and isn’t done.

        • Lightor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Well read the post again. One girl was furious that raunchy texts were shared. Looks like we’ve solved the mystery lol.

          But I’m not out here making a legal argument. I’m saying sharing that stuff without consent isn’t OK, morally. You don’t have to be god to look at something like that and have the guts to say something.