I don’t really have a question but I want to talk about noodles, please. Is a tamale a noodle or a sandwich?

    • SoupOfTheDay@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Isn’t the whole point of “toast” that it’s bread that is toasted? How can sushi, an undeniable raw food be “toast”? I’ll accept the cube rule, but toast needs a new classification.,

    • MrsEaves@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Didn’t know I could be more upset about this argument but this rule really takes the cake sandwich. Though for this specific instance, I agree it’s a calzone.

    • j4k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Does this mean I can get thin crust tamales in New York, and grease death tamales in Chicago

    • Bizzle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I understand the cube rule, I just don’t think I can really subscribe to it. Calling a bowl of lucky charms nachos is inaccurate, it’s clearly a soup.

  • quortez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    This type of food taxonomy is always fascinating and disturbing, as it tends to spawn even more unhinged classifications (ravioli is a dumpling. A bowl of cereal is a salad).

    That being said, the most politically neutral take would be that tamales are a pie.

  • WisteriaCat@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Neither! A tamale is corn masa with typically a meat filling. You could consider it a dumpling or a pie. Noodles do not have a stuffing and sandwiches tend to have a distinct layers. I would consider a taco or maybe a gordita a sandwich, but not a tamale. Although this does make me wonder, what would a burrito be classified as? (not counting wrap because that is too easy)

  • riley@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    No. The point of noodles is that they hold their form without any help when you cook them. Without their leafy containers, tamales would be more like polenta/corn meal mush–also yummy but not noodly.
    https://prnt.sc/4atIxUL1D90X R-amen.

  • riley@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Not, say, if you want to make cacio e pepe. (I’m a new reddit refugee, so I haven’t figured out how to respond to a comment.)

  • jclinares@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    As a Mexican, I am very disturbed by this question. It’s not stupid (that doesn’t exist in this community), it’s just disturbing xD

    No, a tamale is not a noodle. Noodles don’t have fillings, are longer, and thinner. It’s like asking if ravioli is a noodle.

    • 1024_Kibibytes@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      As someone from the U.S. who grew up eating Mexican food in Texas, I agree. It is disturbing. The filling is very important to a tamal. They aren’t bendy or thin either. Noodles are thin and bendy

      • zeppo@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        i am new mexico af and i respect your carne guisada, but really. NM food kills it. Please come over to Santa Fe and check out green chile Carne Adovada. “Texas” lol