I’m referring to the sh.itjustworks instance. Which one would be it? Because I’m kind of confused…
You must log in or register to comment.
“Yes”
Mostly both.
deleted by creator
#!/bin/sh/itjustworks
I’ve always read it as “shit just works”. Why would the “sh” be there if we weren’t supposed to read it?
No, it’s a comforting “sh” like “shhhhh”, don’t worry, it just works.
It’s only one h for the double entendre.
/joking
Probably the latter. I’ve seen it abbreviated as SJW, that’s unnecessary don’t do that. Am I old?
I dunno, sjw is a lot shorter than shit just works
Yeah but… SJW means something else lmfao
Shit, justice works.
Shit, Jehovah’s Witnesses
Savior, Jesus Wept
Why not s.j.w?
For starters, because .w is not a valid TLD, and j.w would be registered in about 50 milliseconds if it ever became one.
shhhh. it just works.
Imagine a greasy old IT technician coming up to you, putting a finger on your lips and gently saying that after you gasped about the entangled mess of hundreds of Ethernet cables in the server room
Hmmm. What if it’s because the admin was an old school Linux user and never took to bash. “sh. it just works”.
Why not both?
I always assumed that it was supposed to be ambiguous between them for humor purposes
sh. it’s plausible deniability 🤫
Shhh… we don’t ask such things around here… it just works ™ that way…
Sh! It just works.
Shell it just works
Its:
“shhh… nothing is broken, ignore all the bugs and pretend it all just works, mm’kay?”
sh.itjust.works
Shhhhhhh… itjustworks
Shit just works - forever and always.
(shh, it just works and shit just works are both valid - the intent was the former IIRC - but the latter is obviously the superior choice. I’m also partial to sh.it.heads when referring to users [cheeky, but thought about in the same way as Deadheads for Grateful Dead fans])
