• NotNotMike@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I mean, I’m not much of a tinfoil hat, but this article feels extremely conveniently timed for Intel, who is currently going through a massive ordeal with their chips. Especially considering that the vulnerability is so extremely difficult to exploit that there’s borderline no story here for 99% of people but the headline will still drive clicks and drama.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Intel has literally done this, and stuff like it before.

      They back “independent” researchers who twist themselves in knots to make AMD look bad.

      Look up the multiple counts of bullshit from a “research group” called Principled Technologies.

      Sidenote: the guy who ran it was Ryan Shrout, who used to work for PC Perspective, and would usually give favourable reviews to Intel. After leaving Principled Technologies, he got a high up marketing position at… drumroll… Intel!

      Principled Technologies isn’t the only scam “independent researcher” Intel has set up or paid handsomely either.

    • heavy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I loathe what part of the security community has become with the stunt hacking and vuln naming. That being said, I doubt it’s some conspiracy. I don’t know all the details but it wouldn’t be exceptional to identify a bug that has existed in processor firmware or legacy code for a long time.

      People are looking at this stuff all the time, both professionally and for fun. You could make the case that it’s inevitable that there will be exploits found that affect a huge population.

      In the end, as long as the layman gets smarter about computer security, the better people will react to vuln drops.