• Maalus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    They could be “snooping” on the fediverse anyway by starting an instance and federating.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They could and anyone things that they’re not already doing that is high. But thats not the concern of the fedipact. We just dont want them here as in their posts, their culture and their behavior.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which is batty. I want lemmy to grow, to have niche communities open up etc. Gatekeeping people because “we don’t take kindly to your type” is plain stupid.

        • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          We’ve already had this debate and we don’t care that you don’t like it. If you want to be on Threads, go be on fucking Threads. Not all of us want Lemmy to grow at all.

          • Blxter@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why would you not want it to grow. I would have never cared about my online privacy if I didn’t stumble upon a Lemmy thread on reddit and join. I would have never ditched windows for Linux without Lemmy. I would not have done a lot of things without Lemmy. Saying you don’t want it to grow is dumb if something does not grow it will die. If you don’t want to see there content then block them. You should not be able to decide what others see.

        • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Whatever „batty“ means.

          Your argument is falsely equating our „we dont accept authoritarian systems here“ to „we dont accept people“ which is thinly veiled gaslighting.

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, the issue is “we don’t accept people from facebook”. It doesn’t matter what their opinion is - facebook bad.

            • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              facebook bad.

              The company that has been complicit with multiple ethnic cleansing campaigns, election manipulation schemes, and attempted to suppress their own research showing that their platform harms children? Yeah. They’re pretty ethically bankrupt and anyone with something resembling scruples should want nothing to do with them. The users are welcome to join an existing instance or create their own. The company needs to be blocked.

            • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              You‘re doing it again. Please stop putting words in my mouth.

              We dont accept facebook here, period.

              • Maalus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Which is the exact same thing I said - you don’t care about the people, you just go “facebook bad” and ban it