Data-driven as in the data drove, or you drove the data?
*reads article*
Well, that answered my question.
It’s honestly jarring how they don’t define extreme even though they distinguish it from far (by saying extreme is a subcategory of far). Also the lack of criteria for determining how they classified subs into categories such as tankie. And, it should probably go without saying, how they call for intensive moderation on these groups without indicating what harm or risk they represent. It’s almost theatrical.
Data-driven as in the data drove, or you drove the data?
*reads article*
Well, that answered my question.
It’s honestly jarring how they don’t define extreme even though they distinguish it from far (by saying extreme is a subcategory of far). Also the lack of criteria for determining how they classified subs into categories such as tankie. And, it should probably go without saying, how they call for intensive moderation on these groups without indicating what harm or risk they represent. It’s almost theatrical.