• ugh
      link
      fedilink
      24 months ago

      But… bathrooms!!! With the children!!! /s

  • @Cowbee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    24 months ago

    Socialism/Communism/Anarchism. Barely anyone who actually understands them and the theory supporting them hates them, but tons of people have been fed Red Scare propaganda on the matter.

      • @Cowbee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        04 months ago

        That’s a bit of a non-answer, isn’t it? I’m clearly referring to implementing leftist structures today, not historically.

  • I Cast Fist
    link
    fedilink
    24 months ago

    The idea of using public transportation. It’s something for “them” (the poor), not for “me” (rich). Changes significantly from country to country, I suppose, but it’s a prevalent thought here.

    • @WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      04 months ago

      Public transportation is good. Sanitation on public transportation in America is bad.

      I got very adept at touching nothing while riding a bumpy subway car in New York, but even that couldn’t always save me from the puddle of piss that ran like a heat seeking stream from the legs of the mentally ill.

  • ReCursing
    link
    fedilink
    14 months ago

    Nickelback. I mean they’re not good but they’re not really bad either, just a complete nonevent. They don’t deserve the hate they get, they don’t really deserve anything

  • TruthAintEasy
    link
    fedilink
    14 months ago

    Oh lots of things

    Women
    Ethnicities
    LGTBQ+
    Drag Queens ( they are so entertaining)
    Inconvenient truths
    People who hang toilet paper the wong way
    The French (cowards? They won more battles than anyone and have mastered the art of standing up for themselves)
    Furries
    Pineapple on pizza ( its good, Ill die on this hill)
    Bronies
    Caillou - not, that whiney snot deserves it
    Marijuana
    Ned Flanders
    Bell bottoms
    Satan ( the word in acient hebrew that we translated to Satan first appears in the book of Job, and would more accuratly be rendered as accuser of prosecutor. In the whole bible satan only goes after 10 people, and only when god tells satan to do it. Half way through satan is like ‘um god? This guys like, broken now. Call it good?’ But that rapscallion god was like ‘no, he could still recover keep hitting him’ and all that because god ‘knew’ Job was the most loyal and devout of his followers and his narcisism just couldnt help but make a grand display of proving it)

  • Call me Lenny/Leni
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 months ago

    Non-monogamists. Not referring to simply polyamorists or even relationship anarchists, but non-monogamists in general. When I saw LGBT equality unfold in the first world, I thought “yay we’re finally throwing off those norms” but here we are a decade or so later and polyamory still gets everyone saying “meh”. The only time I’ve ever seen polyamorists in late night media was in an episode of The Resident, and it was used to illustrate the man as a cult leader, which tied into the show like pineapple ties into pizza (I do not miss that show). But you have an LGBT couple in every five episodes.

    • @electric_nan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      04 months ago

      I think this one is tough. I know a few people that consensual non-monogamy has worked out well for (long term), but most of the people that I know who tried it out it hasn’t gone well. So I’m not against it in theory, but it comes with a lot of caveats. I don’t personally know anyone who began a monogamous relationship, transitioned to poly, and had it end well. I tend to think of this scenario as a sign of relationship trouble, or a cause of it. Maybe it’s not polyamory’s fault that so many people in relationship trouble are drawn to it.

      • @jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        It’s pretty common to the point of being cliché that “we opened up out relationship” will fail. Usually the people involved are going to come at it in an extremely hierarchical way. Often there are existing problems that aren’t being addressed. It’s almost at the same tier as “let’s have a baby to save our relationship”

        People who are non monogamous from the start I expect have similar success rates as anyone else.

      • @DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        04 months ago

        I know a lot of people for whom monogamy hasn’t turned out well, too. Lots of divorces and broken hearts. If you think of all the relationships that don’t work out, the ones that do are miracles.

        • @electric_nan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          04 months ago

          That’s fair for sure. I do think I’ve lived long enough to know a few predictors of failed relationships though, and if someone tells me they’re opening up the relationship, then I expect them to be done within a year.

          • @DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            04 months ago

            That’s probably a selection bias though. Most people might try opening up their relationship when there are already problems.

            • @electric_nan@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              14 months ago

              It’s true, and I kind of mentioned that in my original comment. I’m just speaking from my experience. I do know one couple with an open relationship who have been going strong for years. The difference for them (I think) is that they have been poly since the beginning.

  • @S13Ni
    link
    14 months ago

    Veganism. Many people wilfully misunderstood all arguments why people choose to be vegans and come up with all kinds of strawman arguments and make believe scenarios that are totally beside the point.

    I am usually rather reasonable with my carnist friends cause I believe calm respectful conversations are better to change people’s minds than heated debate.

    People always say vegans push their agenda, and maybe some people specially on internet do, but more often it’s the other way around, it comes up that you are a vegan and someone just has to try debate it. I’m usually well prepared for those arguments cause I have done my research but it doesn’t matter cause they never listen.

    No I don’t think I’m better person than you.

    No my first goal as vegan is not to take issue with some native fisherman.

    Yes, if I was stranded on deserted island hypothetically I might reconsider my principles.

    Yes, you actually get everything you need from diet if you construct it right. There are people bigger than you who can lift more than you who are vegan.

    It’s not some sacred pact written in stone. I never really slip from my diet, but I still got common sense if situation should change.

    It just gets tiring, I don’t even bring it up that often to people.

  • @rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    14 months ago

    Pit-bulls. Most of their bad reputation comes from organizations that campaign against their very existence and people will quote pit-bull bite statistics with the same lack of irony as a white nationalist quoting FBI crime statistics about people of color.

    • @soviettaters@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      04 months ago

      I think the issue is with normalizing unhealthy bodies. idc how you look as long as you’re healthy, but society is becoming increasingly accepting of obviously unhealthy lifestyles and bodies. It’s no better than anorexia.

      • Truffle
        link
        fedilink
        04 months ago

        Unhealthy bodies like how? What dobyou mean by that? How can you know someone’s health status and or lifestyle by the way they look? If that were true, blood Labs and other tests would be useless.

        • @GoodbyeBlueMonday@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          If your eyeballs are missing, I can make an assumption that your vision isn’t great just by looking at you. That’s not a moral judgement.

          Doesn’t mean blood tests are useless, and in fact it means we have some idea where to start investigating a potential health problem.

          Yes, I agree that there’s bias against folks who are overweight, and also that there’s a range of risk associated with being overweight. It’s pretty clear, however, that obesity is a health concern that we should take seriously. If someone smokes five pack of cigs a day, I’m going to make an assumption about their lung health. There’s always outliers that live to 100 smoking and not doing exercise, but it would be a shit doctor if they didn’t tell folks not to follow their example.