• HAL_9_TRILLION@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly this. If you don’t want me to quit without notice, do you also vote against politicians who vote for “right-to-work” legislation?

      Yeah, you don’t get to write a fucking law that says you can fire me on the spot for any reason at all and then insist that I give you two weeks.

      Besides, these days it’s a different world - there’s a labor shortage. A serious one. Warm body? You’re hired. Nobody gives a fuck. They can’t afford to. Especially in minimum wage.

    • Norgur@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, laws can change that. So instead of fucking bosses, fuck workers protection laws.

      • Astongt615@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s also a shame that holding ourselves to bare minimum of laws is acceptable. Laws should not have to equal moral contracts for people to have moral contracts…

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The key is to dip after changing the password on the vital database they decided one person was enough to manage ;)

      Pretty sure this kind of sabotage can expose one to legal consequences

    • excitingburp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the US there is no notice period for firing in “at-will” states (which is all except Montana). It goes both directions though, there is no notice period when quitting. So chances are, if the OP is in the US, the boss was full of it.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Eh, if you’re really done and just refuse to do anything they say, they’ll have you discharged inside a month. The couple times I saw it happen it actually looked like a relief on both sides. Nobody bothered the guy leaving anymore, and he would willingly do office chores again for the last 3 or 4 weeks.

            Of course you don’t get all of your benefits, you can never come back, and the re-enlistment codes are regularly leaked so any HR will know how you left the second they see your discharge form.

            When it gets nasty and takes months is when the leadership wants someone gone and the soldier insists on trying to to stay.

  • passntrash@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I doubt this actually happened, I’m still disturbed by everyone cheering it on absent any context that would make OP not look like a petulant child.

    Quitting without notice doesn’t require justification, fuck the bosses, whatever.

    But for all we know, this manager had bent over backwards to stand up for their employees, or cover for them. Maybe this employee took advantage of that and was miserable to his coworkers. Those are just as likely as anything else, given that no further information was provided.

    At least invent a backstory how this manager was dogshit or abusive, or the company was awful. Make us want to believe that you’re not just someone with a persecution complex who’s quick to anger and lash out.

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is sad this is the defacto situation now, but it shouldn’t be that way. Managers should be there in interest of employees, to keep them on board, happy, and able to do their job efficiently… The company can’t run without workers. Too many companies have forgotten that. A manager should be a buffer between the employees and the “corporate machine” (or better yet get rid of the corporate machine, but ya know…).

            • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              They’re saying that just because you claim something ought to be a certain way it has no bearing in how it is, or ever was.

              This is a common thing done by libs to support capitalism. They talk about how it “ought” to work, as if there is any way for capitalism to exist that is not inherently anti-social. Its a defense used by the cynical and well meaning alike, a deflection to ignore the reality of how these hierarchical relationships were always designed to be. Its similar to how libs say its not capitalism its “crony capitalism”

              What you’re saying ought to be not only isn’t, but never was. And talking about how it “ought to be” isn’t a defense of reality

              • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ah, thanks for the explanation. I wasn’t trying to defend anything, but I suppose I see how including the “now” in my original comment might be construed in a “things used to be better” way. Wasn’t my intention, I have no idea how it used to be anyway.

                Not going to edit the original though, for preservation of the context for this conversation.

                • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Of course. Yeah i didn’t think you meant it as a hard defense of anything. Your comment seemed totally well intentioned. And if capitalism was capable of good and not an inherently anti-social system then it ought to be like you’re describing.

                  I think a lot of well intentioned people can get caught in that place of talking about how it ought to be instead of realizing why its not.

        • PopMyCop@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe MY experience is limited, but what manager these days isn’t pulling double duty? They do 3/4 of the job time with duties no different than the people under them, and also have to do all the managing part when possible. This is how it’s been in the public service, retail, and customer service jobs I’ve worked.

          • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Basically my experience. 90% of my job is unchanged, but I have to deal with extra emails and making sure there’s toilet paper. Granted, I’d never bring up 2 week notices. Companies will not ensure that for workers, so workers should make fun of those companies for suggesting that. Hell, my mom’s work asked if she’d give them 6 months noticed because they were understaffed and the other staff couldn’t do their jobs and she laughed at her boss and told them they wouldn’t do that for her.

          • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            There is a line somewhere up the chain in basically every company where they shift to being corporate boot heels.

    • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’d be more inclined to see your point, except that the manager in question said “each job requires 2 weeks notice” like he was indignant that he didn’t get something he deserved.

      That’s not only not true at all, it’s active manipulation on their part in a hail Mary attempt to have their work covered for enough time to look for another employee.

      It may be unprofessional to quit without notice, but it’s really unprofessional to present the act of quitting as requiring 2 weeks’ notice, particularly in a place that might also allow the employer to fire someone for any reason at any time with no notice.

      • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s really unprofessional to present the act of quitting as requiring 2 weeks’ notice

        If it’s part of the contract then it’s not unprofessional at all to bring up the terms that you’ve agreed on. My job requires a month’s notice and it wouldn’t be unprofessional for my employer to bring that up if I tried to quit on the spot.

        That being said, I don’t live in a place with “at-will employment”, which is a fucking travesty and should never have been allowed in the first place.

        • Rev3rze@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not from the US but I always assumed “at-will employment” works both ways. You’re telling me it doesn’t?

          • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not typically written into the contract for most jobs I’ve seen, but it’s still considered very unprofessional to leave without giving the company time to find a replacement. It doesn’t just mess with the company or your boss; it messes with your coworkers, too, who now have to pick up the slack.

            Basically, while it’s not written into your contract, it’s still considered socially unacceptable not to give a two week notice barring any unusual circumstances.

            • Rev3rze@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s always been in my contracts, a month’s notice is the norm here. I’ve never broken that but I’ve also been fortunate enough to work at places where work and life are balanced. I wouldn’t have wanted to disrupt the work for my colleagues and my managers have always shown their respect for me to the point that I want to work with them instead of against them. I don’t think I’ll ever work for an employer that puts the company over the wellbeing of their employees. I’ve seen what being a real team means. People cooperate freely and go the extra mile for eachother if necessary and cut massive amounts of slack to anybody in the team that’s having a tough time and needs to focus on their life outside of work for a bit.

              That said I won’t ever get any bonuses or make large amounts of money in my career either but that’s not what I’m after if it would mean putting work before life.

            • Syndic@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Na my dude, as long it’s not considered at least as unprofessional for companies to let people on the spot they can go an fuck them self.

              Want a mandated notice period? Put it in contract for both parties. That’s how it works in countries with sane worker laws.

          • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ll be honest, I’ve never lived in a place that has at-will employment so I don’t know the details, but I’d also assume that it works both ways.

    • keepcarrot [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m curious about the relationship to managers in different industries. Fast food compared to programming. Warehouse/stacking managers have always treated the workers like idiots where I’ve been at. IT support depended on the company. Mail sorting was pretty chill as long as the work got done.

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. The managers speaking on behalf of the company, and the company can fuck itself.

      All companies can fuck themselves.

  • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    We can fire you and sever you from your livelihood at any time, for any or no reason, with zero notice. You must give us two weeks notice to find your replacement before even slightly impacting our bottom line. Repat after me: we are a family.

  • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ive bought a ‘sorry for your loss’ greeting card and write 'I quit ’ on the inside and hand it to my superior before leaving when they asked for my notice in writing. I already had another job, I didn’t need a reference and if I did I’d just have a friend lie for me. Fuck the bosses.

  • MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone that might or might not have engaged in that sort of bold move cotton exit strategies literally mirroring the behavior I had repeatedly received from my corporate overlords let me say that it feels good on the way up.

    On the way up.

  • Sinistar [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    lmao, but also maybe I’ve been lucky but I’ve never had a boss so bad I would do this to 'em. All of my job exits have been amicable and known about well in advance of my last day sans-shrug

          • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh that’s not true at with me. I’m mature enough to not make blanket statements or stereotypes such as that. But when I see kids sensationalizing shit, and manufacturing outrage for the sake of activism…… I call it out.

            Maybe don’t put word into the mouths of others.