• teft@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    245
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah, pigs don’t like to be corrected. Or made to look like they don’t know what they’re doing.

    • tquid@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      143
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And they absolutely hate ever doing anything about bicycle theft in particular.

      • lars@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I reported my bike stolen in college and I got a call the next day that they had found it parked in front of a nearby church.

        It was stolen on a Sunday. I guess someone didn’t want to be late to service.

          • SlikPikker@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Which proves that cops really DO actually do their jobs.

            Because protecting the property of the rich is the exact core purpose of policing.

            • Coasting0942@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Technically it’s maintaining social order. So get back to work menials or be reported to the Enforcers for organized discontent.

        • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Given the number of times I’ve seen cops on police forums and r/protectandserve use terms like “bikefags”, I think it’s just the typical cop disgust of anything they perceive to be weak or effeminate.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, I don’t get that. Bicycling requires strength and endurance. It exposes you to the elements. Why is sitting in a cushy car something some people think as being more macho? Is it that you’re in control of a heavier and more powerful machine?

            • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Bicycling requires strength and endurance.

              So does cleaning a house, but that’s “women’s work”.

              Is it that you’re in control of a heavier and more powerful machine?

              That’s it. You didn’t get it at first because made the mistake of associating manliness with things like patience, strength, hard work, endurance both of toil and hardship; all things that do make up ideals of manliness to normal people. But you need to approach it from the perspective of a wastrel, a weak, foolish, and lazy person who demands the respect and deference of being manly without putting in the hard work—something he has avoided all his life. He might praise hard work in abstract, but he has no discipline for it and doesn’t respect those who actually do it, he just considers them beneath him. To such a person, the defining aspect of manliness and machismo is mastery, mastery over others and their wills, and since mastery through work is a waste of time to him, he turns to shortcuts.

              From there, it’s not hard to see where the thought process goes. Since strength is to him based on control and mastery, he picks something that gives him more command over the road in a direct and in-your-face way. The man who drives a lifted Ram 2500 can confront you by running you the fuck over. By contrast, in his opinion, cyclists are entitled jackasses in miniscule booty shorts who can only confront you on the road by screaming “CRITICAL MASS! FUCKING CAGER!” and throwing sparkplugs at your windows. The difference in power dynamic is proof enough to our friend of who the “real man” is.

              To take the mentality to its conclusion, the easiest way to gain mastery in general is through authority, and the easiest way to get that, even easier than joining a gang, is by becoming a cop.

      • lunarul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It probably depends a lot on where you live. My wife’s bike got stolen and she was woken up by police coming to check on it (one of the maintenance guys at our apartment noticed a man at 7-Eleven riding it and recognized it; came back running to check if it’s indeed missing and called the police). We fully expected the police would do nothing about it (it was the cheapest Walmart bike), but an hour later they called that they found the bike and have the culprit in custody. It did help that the bike was a girly mint green with a wicker basket, so they instantly recognized it when they saw it.

        Then again, in San Francisco, when my wife got her car window smashed and wallet stolen (she was late for class and dropped her wallet under the car seat, didn’t stop to take it; but it wasn’t the wallet that caught the thieves’ attention, it was the breast pump bag that looked like a laptop bag; they threw it on the floor when they saw what it was), we never heard anything back from the police.

    • Fun fact. Cops on average have lower IQ and often fail literacy tests. Furthermore it appears that critical thinking is discouraged in the job, with candidates being selected who lack critical thinking abilities over those that have them.

  • Pazuzu@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I thought this had to be hyperbole, so I did the math myself. I’m assuming human history is 200,000 years as google says, and we want to narrow this down to the second the bike disappeared. also that the bike instantly vanished so there’s no partially existing bike.

    each operation divides the time left in half, so to get from 200k years (6.311×10^12 seconds) to 1 would take ~42.58 divisions, call it 43. even if we take a minute on average to seek and decide whether the bike is there or not it would still be less than an hour of manual sorting

    hell, at 60fps it would only take another 6 divisions to narrow it down to a single frame, still under an hour

    edit: to use the entire hour we’d need a couple more universes worth of video time to sort through, 36.5 billion years worth to be exact. or a measly 609 million years if we need to find that single frame at 60fps

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Part of my job is to review security footage for reported incidents.

    If there is a long-lasting visual cue that the event has or has not happened yet (e.g. a window is either broken or not), then a binary search is very useful.

    If the event lasts only a moment and leaves no visual cue (e.g. an assault), then binary search is practically useless.

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the event lasts only a moment and leaves no visual cue (e.g. an assault), then binary search is practically useless.

      But you will see the event happen though.

      It’s a matter of if you can identify who the perpetrator is or not, but at least that due diligence should be done by police, looking at the person doing the crime and see if they can be identified.

      • null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But you will see the event happen though.

        Not with a binary search.

        Edit: just collapse this thread and move on. Cosmic Cleric is an obvious troll.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But you will see the event happen though.

          Not with a binary search.

          Yes you will.

          A binary search is just what it says, it’s just for searching only.

          When you find that moment in time where the bike was there one moment, and then the next moment the bike’s not there, then you view at regular or even slow-mo at those few seconds of the bike in the middle of disappearing, and see the perpetrator, and hopefully can identify them.

          • Azzu@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You didn’t get what was talked about here. Re-read the topmost parent comment.

            How do you binary search for two people arriving, one punches the other, they both leave?

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              How do you binary search for two people arriving, one punches the other, they both leave?

              In the same way the OP talks about it …

              You don’t watch the whole thing, he said. You use a binary search. You fast forward to halfway, see if the bike is there and, if it is, zoom to three quarters of the way through. But if it wasn’t there at the halfway mark, you rewind to a quarter of the way though. Its very quick. In fact, he had pointed out, if the CCTV footage stretched back to the dawn of humanity it would probably have taken an hour to find the moment of theft.

              Instead of a bike, you look for the aftereffects of a fight happening (chairs knocked down, tables turned over, etc.). You can even look at how many people congregate around the location of the fight before and after the video as a ‘marker’ to the point of time the fight was happening/just finished.

              Edit: One thing we didn’t even mention, AI can also be used these days to notice subtle changes in the video. If a video is a static image of an alley, then two people walk in the alley and fight, even though they leave no traces behind, that moment of the fight is caught on the video with activity/movement. Motion sensor movement, basically.

                • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You are seriously confused.

                  And you are seriously trying to kill the messenger.

                  OP specifically said that you’re fucked if there is no visual cue.

                  And I’m saying there’s ALWAYS a visual clue/cue, always. Either the bike is there one minute and gone another, or a fight breaks out and trashes the place from the fight. In the vast amount of cases, there’s always a visual difference.

                  And in this case we’re talking specifically about a bike, going missing.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m a little surprised the police didn’t already know about that method. Seems like they’d encounter enough CCTV footage that’d it’d be standard training.

    I once again overestimate the training levels of the police.

  • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s how I look for broken mods too. Move half of them into a temp folder, launch the game. If it works, put half of the sorted out ones back. if it doesn’t work, remove another half and try again.

  • FALGSConaut [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Their method actually does make sense, you just have to remember they aren’t cops to solve (boring) crimes like petty theft. Why get it done as efficiently as possible when you can milk it for hours of overtime? 12 hours of footage means 6+ hours of overtime even watching it at x2 speed, and it’s the kind of thing you can basically have going on in the background. Cops being willfully ignorant for their own benefit makes sense to me

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You know what’s even better than milking it for 6hrs of OT? Saying its “to hard” to the victim, going home and then lying about doing 6hrs of OT and getting paid anyway.

      Cops lie about OT systemically. Its absolutely rampant. The only consequence they ever get is either a few hrs suspension without pay or fired, and most states are happy to hire them next door immediately so they can do it again.

  • Alph4d0g@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sure it didn’t go well. If it was somehow framed in a sycophantic way where the police were led to believe it was their idea, I’m sure it would have gone better. Wait that might not be too difficult to do.

    • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      more importantly cops don’t actually give a shit about solving crime.

      In England the police primarily exist to keep noise down in middle class areas. I assume it’s even worse in America

      • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That is their primary purpose here too but it just requires more violence and subjection, Americans are extra noisy.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “This argument didn’t go down well.”

    🤣🤣🤣 LMAO

    What an awesome punchline, should have been on its own line for more impact.

  • groucho@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    The final project in my instrumentation class was to tune a PID controller for a hot/cold mixing valve. I (CS/ENG) was paired up with an engineering student and a lot of it was throwing parameters in, seeing if weird shit happened, and then turning down or up based on the result. I had a programming final and something else I was supposed to be studying for, so I just started doing a binary search with the knobs. We got the thing tuned relatively fast and my partner acted like I was a wizard.

    • clericc@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      How do you do a binary search for an open-end scale (are PID params open-end?) and three knobs at the same time when they interdepend in their influence? I need to know since i have a PID tuning on my personal projects plate

      • groucho@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s been ages, but we’d done rough calculations for the three controls so we roughly knew what we needed. Our teacher was big on manually tuning instead of just using formulas since he thought just running numbers “lacked artfulness.”

        So we grabbed a point and started searching around manually. I think we were just tuning the derivative portion at that point, trying to get a fast response without the system without it going chaotic and noisy.

  • Localhorst86@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Exactly my point. We will not be investing an hour looking at the footage to pinpoint the time of theft, now get out!”