

1·
6 days agoWhy not both? We need to be hitting the road running from as many angles as we can to get people mobilized.
Why not both? We need to be hitting the road running from as many angles as we can to get people mobilized.
Yeah none of the studies linked put animal ag over 17% of global emissions, while it provides the majority of protein to the global populace. Sanctioning the biggest polluters (e.g. big oil, chemical companies, etc) would be a far more effective means of reducing global pollution. That’s not to say we can’t reduce our consumption of animal protein - we absolutely should, IMO - but calling 17% tops the leading cause is a spurious argument.
I’m sure plantbasednews.org is a non-biased, reputable news source.
Bold claim. I’ll tack onto that and say cats don’t belong in cities.