I’ll never forget when the AOLers started showing up.

Trump enacts tariffs on Canada.

Exactly. Trump. Not the states that voted against him. If you want to retaliate, retaliate against Trump. Make him, and the people that voted for him feel the pain.

Look at the things he’s doing domestically. There’s nothing he and his MAGA dipshits love more than sticking it to the blue states. So, Canada doing something that predominantly hurts blue states isn’t going to hurt Trump at all. Quite the contrary, it’s going to give him huge hard-on.

So, if your goal is to help Trump, well then carry on.

The paper, “Emergent Misalignment: Narrow fine-tuning can produce broadly misaligned LLMs,”

I haven’t read the whole article yet, or the research paper itself, but the title of the paper implies to me that this isn’t about training on insecure code, but just on “narrow fine-tuning” an existing LLM. Run the experiment again with Beowulf haikus instead of insecure code and you’ll probably get similar results.

Opponent’s donation page: https://secure.actblue.com/donate/sc-website?refcode=sc_website

Not spending money on the necessities is not saving money.

Incorrect. Someone

Me

posited that China’s scientific achievements

alleged achievements

were merely propaganda,

No. If true, the achievements are achievements. Actual achievements aren’t propaganda. However, the claims of the alleged achievements are coming from a country notorious for whitewashing history and making claims of scientific discoveries that later turn out to be optimistic at best, and often complete fabrications. So, skepticism of their claims of achievements (aka propaganda) is justified.

And that’s what this thread, that I started, is about. Responding to a post about some alleged scientific breakthrough, stating that such claims should be taken with a big grain of salt (aka, skepticism).

YOU then moved the goalpost to try to argue about whether increased funding for scientific research leads to better results. We don’t know that these results actually happened. We don’t know that there was actually any increase in funding. All we know is that a notorious liar is claiming so. This thread was never about whether funding scientific research can lead to discoveries. It’s about claims of discoveries from China are not reliable.

and I pointed out that they have invested heavily in research, which tends to produce outcomes.

And that’s when you moved the goalpost, likely because you don’t want to discuss China’s history of lies and propaganda.

The discussion was about the unreliability of Chinese propaganda. You moved to funding scientific research. You didn’t just move the goalpost a bit. You relocated it to a different city.

Here’s your logical fallacy.

Skepticism of positive press (aka propaganda) from a country notorious for cracking down on negative press (i.e. any mention of Tiananmen Square) is not a phobia. It’s completely justified.

Removed by mod

Any announcements like this coming from China should be taken with a huge grain of salt the size of… China.

Any of a million other people. For Luigi’s case, it doesn’t matter who did it. Luigi didn’t, end of discussion.

Can’t have positive results if you don’t test, duh.

See teslatakedown.com to find a protest near you.

https://catmagicpunks.com/collections/claws

“pastime” is correct. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/pastime

People just liked it better that way.

deleted by creator

• Your favorite celebrity

Git outta here with that thar metric mumbo jumbo!