one can care without an effective means to do something about it.

This is factually incorrect, and easily disproved with just the scantest effort.

if that were true, you could prove it, instead of claiming it’s easy to prove.

The conclusion that you are an animal abuser then becomes an unavoidable consequence.

no, you’re making a leap of logic

you should get some asics and mergemine while you heat your home

You are an animal abuser.

this is a baseless claim.

you’re still eating more of them by eating animal products…

not necessarily. we mostly feed livestock parts of plants we don’t or can’t eat. so while spinach is human-edible, the spinach fed to chickens is not handled in a way that keeps it safe for human consumption. by feeding it to livestock, we are conserving resources.

most people are not abusing animals.

nice. not perfect but pretty cool

no one is talking about betting but you. the discussion is about ethics and voting.

the burden is on you to show their relevance

saying it doesn’t make it true

usda first time home buyers direct loan program (502)

when will you accept that there are an infinite number of possible outcomes, including no one taking power at all?

it’s a story, not math.

these are irrelevant examples. it’s a pure red herring.

this isn’t proof. it’s storytelling.

some of the people who refused to vote for Democrats are queer.

Non-voters/protest voters don’t give a fuck about trans people

prove it

refusing to accept the reality of mathematics

support your claim

As a trans woman, I blame them for saying, “Your life is not worth biting the bullet for.”

I don’t believe voting for Democrats is an effective way to save anyone’s life.