The post links to it, in case that isn’t working for you, it’s !fuckyourheadlights@lemmy.world

Cool thank you, I haven’t heard of analog.cafe before.

What analog photography feeds do you have? I’m currently only subscribed to Emulsive, which seems to have stopped being updated, and parts of 35mmc

I use a 40% (corne specifically) for full time dev work. I use (neo)vim so I don’t really need any of the keys you mentioned apart from some function keys, for which I only have to hold one modifier and having them closer to the home row is much more comfortable.

We have that in the UK, the parties all publish manifestos before elections. I think it helps to get the message across and to be clear about what they are and aren’t promising to do. They aren’t, however, legally enforceable so parties aren’t obliged to actually follow up on their promises.

I use it over other tools, but I haven’t used the proprietary tools so I can’t provide a comparison.

It looks like a hand coloured photo to me, which were apparently popular in Japan for a while

I don’t see it as ridiculing anyone. It’s criticising the system that created this mess.

Blaming cyclists for something a motorist failed to do seems to be a uniquely North American thing.

I can tell you that it’s also very much a thing in many parts of Europe.

You don’t even need that many people before cars become impractical.

In two years presumably. It’s been two years away since 2015.

Speak for yourself. I’m not pulling this out of my arse, I’m telling you things I just happen to know.

A single train with a single crew can transport more people in a day when travelling at higher speed.

This is running costs. The capital costs are irrelevant.

It’s cheaper to run a high speed service than a low speed one. You can transport more people with the same number of staff and trains because it runs faster. The solution isn’t to run an artificially cheaper low speed service along side, it’s to run the high speed service in a sane way.

The problem isn’t how they’re constructed, it’s how they’re run, and this article is basically just complaining about SNCF without realising it. They run bad timetables and aim for high occupancy rather than transporting more people. Jon Worth has better writing on the topic IMO.

Should it not be double foldable? It has two folds

Or the fact that it doesn’t need to be real because 1. It’s still funny and 2. We all know that the incident has happened somewhere, because shit like this happens so often.

If there isn’t space to overtake two cyclists side by side, there isn’t space to overtake one cyclist. If there’s another car coming towards you while you overtake, you’d be endangering the one cyclist.

New roads don’t reduce traffic, they create more. It’s called induced demand. We should be building viable alternatives to driving.

Gotta have at lease a little bit of victim blaming