The difference is that you need way more interaction. Expose a webserver on the internet and check how many requests you get from just bots.

You can control what you navigate and how to interact with the outside world, but you can’t control how the outside world will interact with your services.

Don’t expose anything from your local network to the internet (unless you want multiple new sysadmins in your house). Try tailscale instead.

It’s pretty funny, because from mechanicalkeyboards they suggested to post here because you have more knowledge on low profile keyboards.

Do anyone have feedback on this?

https://chosfox.com/products/chosfox-l75-keyboard-kit?variant=42798174732482

Looks promising

Row staggered but not splitted.

How much like the corne do you want it to be?

like a normal keyboard and not split

Also, how DIY do you want to get?

As long as no soldering is required I am up for everything

WannaCry targeted hospitals, businesses and similar machines.

WannaCry targeted everything with SMB exposed, blindly.

Also, you should read more about security through obscurity, the fact that “no one will target you because you are a low-value target” is a false sense of security.

I don’t know why the author of the video didn’t mention it but LockDown mode is really useful.

At least for me the default is lockdown mode on and appropriate exceptions for websites I trust.

I believe the risk of running outdated software is super inflated and mediatic, 99% of people would be absolutely fine running a version of Android from 3 years ago or Windows 8.

That’s the same thing people running windows XP on internet were thinking in 2017.

Then WannaCry arrived and they got their data encrypted :)

Perhaps images, video, font etc. rendering could be compromised?

Yes, it already happen in the past. Also the Wi-Fi and Bluetooth stack got exploited, like multiple kernel drivers.

But it shouldn’t be a matter of “in the past was X exploited?” but more on having a correct security posture.

Honestly if you are arguing about wasting a “perfectly working phone” you should blame it on the vendor, especially Android devices vendors have this let’s say “defect” of dropping the support after 4/5 years.

Also not going to talk about custom ROMs (with the super rare exclusion of some) managed by god knows who, without any security team behind.

Since even the NFC and Cellular Network stack got vulnerabilities the only way you would consider an old phone “safe” to use is just turning it into the equivalent of a local ARM server.

Also pretty fun seeing the replies in the original post talking about how Google Play store shouldn’t have malware on it.

Do anyone knows if it support local-only without joining the p2p network?

I was thinking about that just today, I have something like 30+ services running on a single compose file and maintenance is slowly becoming hard. Probably moving to multiple compose file.

I use the Inbox-Zero method

https://youtu.be/al1QXFQjq1s

So far no issues.

Soon, people will join the strange and buggy world of YouTube alternative frontends

Because I wanted to try if others URI schemas were supported instead of http / https. file:// was a valid one. Don’t worry, the day an attempt of data exfil will happen, you will not see it though your console logs.

Is this, by any chance, originated from the sub called ignore? In that case is probably my bad because is set as the image of the channel. (I was playing with lemmy in the previous version and forgot about it, sorry. It will not work since your browser can’t access local file that easily without breaking the sandbox :))

Edit: I removed it so you shouldn’t see the alert anymore. What I wasn’t expecting is that apparently every sub is loaded even if you don’t visit it.

/cc @shellsharks@infosec.pub

Why Russia thinks they cooperated with Apple when the agencies can just buy 0days from the resellers?

Especially Adblock 😵