

Another section of the slide provides an estimate on the percentage each country allocates to naval production in its shipyards, with China garnering roughly 70% of its shipbuilding revenue from naval production, compared to about 95% of American shipbuilding revenue.
Because of China’s centrally planned economy, the country is able to control labor costs and provide subsidies to its shipbuilding infrastructure, allowing the Chinese to outbid most competitors around the world and dominate the commercial shipping industry, Sadler said.
Sadler argued that the U.S. has not built a comparable shipbuilding infrastructure because builders only have the U.S. government as a customer.
“The federal government is the sole customer … your biggest customer where you get your biggest margin of profit is building the big high-tech expensive naval ships,” Sadler said. “That’s the only show in town for us. And unfortunately, **because that’s the case, no one’s looking to get competitive **and building better container ships or the next generation commercial shipping vessel, which is what we really need to be doing.”
So the American naval yards derive much more revenue from the federal government than Chinese naval yards, yet they aren’t actually federally controlled. Also, they aren’t able to innovate or compete like china’s centrally managed naval yards.
Sounds like a real contradiction brewing.
The Iron Wall, an essay from influential revisionist Zionist jabotinsky in 1923, just shy of 100 years ago to the day. It is nakedly, unabashedly colonialist and its influence can clearly be seen in the Netanyahu regime.
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/quot-the-iron-wall-quot
Consider reading your ethnonationalist veggies instead of doomscrolling