I think that was only a thing in earlier editions right?

Doesn’t it take a minute to cast?

I feel like it would get much better a mistake if they did… I use both windows and Linux now. I would rather use Linux full time but some software, specifically office and some (not most, but a few) don’t play nice with Linux.

If I just lost a ton of programs that I would say are critical for windows, no doubt I switch full time unless my work prevents me.

I think a lot of us have been voting as best we can.

I mean, he can just deny the majority of them. It doesn’t matter.

The red eyes are kinda creepy and scary…

2

I mean, it’s the NY post. I don’t think this stuff is worth posting. It’s like feeding the trolls.

There are a lot of divorced people who like it play the victim when it was painfully obvious what they were giving up to everyone but them. Divorce is horrible.

There are of course many who have escaped abused through divorce, so I don’t want to act like they are all the same, but man can people be selfish.

The OS they choose is really not the most important part of its most secure systems.

We could donate them through the Miami police apparently.

I would personally keep the source code for any game I made, and if I can personally afford that, then these companies can.

I mean, the entire goal of the technology was to create human-like text.

I mean, star trek has lots of intelligent life that isn’t human at all. The default is human like, becuase it’s easier to relate to that and becuase it’s easier to make shows like that.

Why is that bad?

If I didn’t regret it, then I wouldn’t call it bad.

Do you believe basically every politician supports slavery and murder then?

They specify human life.

But, I would point out they also say

"We support strengthening the specific rights of animals against abuse and neglect at the hands of those meant to steward them, recognizing them as more than inanimate property. We seek to regulate more strictly animal research, especially pound seizures. We call for stricter regulation of factory farms and stockyards, and the repeal of food-disparagement laws and so-called “ag-gag” laws that prohibit free speech regarding animal agriculture. We support local and family-owned farms and farming cooperatives as essential to ethical, sustainable, and humane consumption. "

I’m quoting Wikipedia which has sources for the claims I made.

But besides that, it seems like the most logical 2ay to talk about what a group believes is to look at what they say about what they believe. That is read their platform.

If you think they are describing their own platform I’m bad faith, I think it’s on you to demonstrate that.

I would be interested in you demonstrating that to me. It would certainly affect my opinion of them if you did so.

Sorry, I misread what you wrong and thus was very unclear. My mistake.

They explicitly support “a universal healthcare system as well as an economy containing widespread distribution of productive property, in particular increased worker ownership and management of their production.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Solidarity_Party

If you view that as supporting the status quo, then I don’t think I understand your position.