Nazi imagery? What? What the hell are you talking about?

The name comes from the French spelling of Ariadne, a Greek mythical character.

Thanks for the clarification. I would even say that I mostly agree with the sentiment. Immigration has been a pointless discussion for years now and I think no party (except the AFD) actually profited from it. SPD and die Grünen have both failed to disspell the AFD narrative.

Well…I think you lost me. The really sudden loss of your job sucks, no matter what. I agree that a lot of people get laid off every day, but I feel sorry for them too. Employee protections in the US are also terrible compared to a lot of other countries. This situation is different, because it is so random, so far reaching and connected with a lot more insecurity. An ailing company may fire people…that is something you can see coming, but what is happening right now is just senseless and not very smart. A lot of things will break and in the end people will die, many people will leave the country and the economy will tank.

While I can only guess, I think he/she meant that all the stupid things the government has done so far should not have come as a surprise to anyone. They announced most of it and even the things they kept “quiet” were pretty obvious. So government employees could have searched for alternative jobs beforehand and kind of “brace for impact” and unions could have planned a coordinated response to bullshit firings. Lawsuits could have (and actually have) been prepared so that it would not take months to react to all the stupid stuff that’s happening now.

Or maybe I am completely wrong :)

Bold statement. Do you have any examples? I would disagree, but maybe I just don’t quite understand what you meant.

I hate typing on my phone and English is not my first language, so I guess the point I was trying to make didn’t quite make its way through. Sorry.

The more conservative party left the coalition because they value their “sovereignty” and “independence” and thus don’t want to play by the rules of the EU. To me they basically just trade one Dependance for another. They want to still be able to sell their oil to the EU, so they depend on EU’s demand for oil, but they don’t want to give up some freedoms even though that in turn would bolster their independence in the energy sector (even more local renewable electricity production, improved infrastructure that would be less susceptible to failure, and so on).

It just makes no sense to me. The EU directives are actually quite in line (or could easily be spun into line) with the ideals of traditionally conservative parties. Yet everywhere (not just Norway), those parties HATE renewable energy. And I think it is pretty clear that money is the big factor here…

Also…maybe I’m blind, but nowhere in the article it’s mentioned that Norway produces its energy with hydro?

I’m always surprised at what their argument is. “Don’t make us invest in cheap renewable energy that will make us independent from other countries”. Sure, they export quite a bit, but that makes your economy dependant on external demand. In all other areas the right leaning parties want to sever themselves from outside influence, except when it involves money…

But he hates being made fun of. He wants people to be angry with him, because that shows him he has some form of power over them (withholding funding makes “the left” angry -> for him that’s good). And he loves to see himself as smart and strong. But if you ridicule him…that hits him.

If the patients hadn’t been transgender, this would not have been dropped. It is illegal to share that data no matter what…

I would love to join, but the whole registration process fails at every turn. Mails aren’t sent, login pages just do refresh…please…just let me iiiiinn

I think this is true for computers that are in danger of being stolen. Laptops or PCs in dorms or other shared living spaces. But I live in a relatively secure area, burglaries are very rare and my PC never leaves the building. So the benefits of encryption are pretty much negligible.

All of which cost more than a 100000 dollars but were still somehow bought on a whim for that one experiment that one time…

I had no cancer, but know people that did and one thing that came up often is that people tend to distance themselves from them. Not in a mean way, but dealing with special needs is tedious and that is often just a cause to not do certain things. Spending time together (no matter what you end up doing) gives a sense of normalcy and can really push someone to keep fighting. Cancer is a marathon with additional sprints (chemo) on top. Not being alone through all of this is a huge help

They have to list their legal contact. Write them an e-mail there and quote the GDPR. Request a confirmation.

I think it points to the character on the left that looks a bit like a character from “Among us”. And they used the available icons to write a name close enough to that (Abong up)

But that’s just a guess…

I…don’t get it. This is an old way to help a child that has something stuck in their throat. I mean, the heimlich maneuver was first described in 1974, so I guess this WAS in fact the best technique at the time. Keeping someone from suffocating is kind of important, and this seems like something you can do fast and easy (at least with a relatively small person).

E-scooter und Pedelecs haben sich auch durchgesetzt, obwohl am Anfang auch viele gesagt haben, dass das nichts bringt.

Am Ende des Tages wird sich aber einfach zeigen müssen ob die Kosten, der Nutzen und die Nachteile so in Einklang gebracht werden können, dass sich für den Volocopter eine Nische ergibt. Der Volocopter ist das erste (echte) Modell in einem neuen Zweig der Verkehrsmittel. Ich glaube das kann durchaus nochmal spannend werden.

Ich denke es gibt durchaus Dinge, die mit einer Drohne nicht gemacht werden können und für die ein Helikopter zu Overkill wäre. Die Lücke zwischen diesen beiden Systemen zu schließen finde ich jetzt nicht sinnlos. Ob sich das durchsetzen wird ist natürlich eine andere Frage und hängt stark vom Preis des Volocopters und der zugehörigen Infrastruktur ab.

Ich sag ja nicht, dass das System die Lösung aller Probleme ist. Elektrische Antriebe besitzen trotzdem gewisse Vorteile gegenüber Verbrennern. Zum Beispiel die Einsatzgeachwindigkeit. Du kannst dich einsetzen und sofort losfliegen.

Hubschrauber sind sehr kompliziert in der Bedienung und können daher nur von Menschen bedient werden, die eine recht lange Ausbildung gemacht haben. Auch die Wartung und der Betrieb von einem Hubschrauber ist sehr teuer.

Das Flugtaxi könnte zum Beispiel die mittellangen und zeitkritischen Transportwege abdecken. Zum Beispiel auch für den Transport von Spender Organen und so.

Bei der Feuerwehr sehe Ich tatsächlich auch weniger Einsatzgebiete. Aber das hängt auch davon ab, wie sehr sich der Copter modifizieren lässt. Eventuell wäre auch da ein Einsatz zur Bergung von Personen möglich.

Ich glaube der große Vorteil von einem Volocopter ist einfach seine relativ kleine Größe, sein elektrischer Antrieb und die einfache Bedienung.