deleted by creator

Original author: QuasarIR

Original Author: Vice-Monkey

There isn’t any open source solution possible if AI models are beholden to copyright laws.

This is advocating for a world where only a handful of companies would be able to train AI models, and the rest of us would become their pets as we move towards an AI driven society.

The artist and writers already lost, there is no going back. Now we see if we all win together or if only google, openai, shutterstock, Adobe, stack overflow, github and reddit win since they are the only ones with the data or able to pay for it.

The shadow part is usually implied, I’m surprised to see it actually written

To add to the other reply, you also don’t need to watch a full video, they register slight pauses as you scroll. They also build a profile using all their platforms and multiple types of data.

Original author: halloha

The ask_____ format is good because it’s easy to find and jump to it’s sister communities like ask historians and ask electricians, etc

Dalle2 was always kind of shit tbh.

I hate Facebook as much as the next guy but I think this whole defederation business just stinks. I left Reddit because they were forcing me to use their app, but now I’m in a community that chooses what I see?

I’m hoping lemmy sets up a way to ban instances because this should 100% be up to the user.

There’s also the fact that this place is starving for content, this really feels like a shoot yourself in the foot kind of moment. The userbase is going to completely stall if there’s an alternative with 100x more content that can’t be accessed from our endpoint.

Its definitely a complicated situation, I know it’s an unpopular opinion so I’ll accept the downvotes.

This community revolves around two sentence horrors, stories where the first sentence typically takes on an other far darker meaning once the second sentence is read.

Its very common for these types of stories to explore difficult content like murder, suicide, conjugal violence, etc so it’s natural that some of them would gravitate to the worst horror of all time.

I think it’s a very big mistake to turn the holocaust into a taboo that can’t be mentioned. I wouldn’t call Schindler’s list or The Book Thief antisemitic, I wouldn’t label this story like that either. I believe it’s okay to explore what happened through popular mediums.

There’s really nothing humourous about it and it doesn’t make light of it at all imo.

The internet belongs to everyone, google should have as much right to it as us. I use public data when I make a fine tune of an llm or a stable diffusion lora.

The only ones to benefit from restricting data access are the big companies, because they already have it all. Don’t fall into the trap of advocating for a closed copyrighted internet, it will only hurt the little guys and literally no one else.

Original author: ITSJABBADAHUTT

All llms are made with scraped data, all image generative services as well.

If data were to become restricted and not public property the moment it’s posted online, then only Adobe and Shutterstock could legally make an image generation service.

Don’t fall into the game of trying to restrict public data, it will only hurt us, the little guys, in the long run.

I still think the head of the halfway house is a bad guy just like the guy thought. Walking up with a shotgun and just shooting the tire was such a terrible idea.

I think it’s fine, even more so if you name who the original author is. I already created two clone subs and I plan on boosting them with a lot of stolen content from a bit everywhere until people join, if they do.

That being said, I’m new.

China didn’t take your job and neither will AI. Corporations will replace you for something that cost less.

We can’t really legislate against AI because other countries won’t. Its also a huge boon for society, we just have to make sure the profits are redistributed and work hours overall are reduced instead of all the productivity gain going into the pockets of the mega wealthy