It all makes sense now.

awesome thx

Ẅ̷̥́ė̴͖͉ ̸̣̫́h̵̫̊͋å̶͚v̸̡̰͗ē̴̦̘ ̸̩̒͝s̸̫̒̎u̸̖̔c̸̲͎̈͗h̴̹̙̏ ̴̢̗̏͂s̵͔̾i̷̳̘͑ĝ̷̪h̸̟͆ẗ̸̨̝́s̷̡̜̈́͛ ̷͈̽t̸̹͈̀o̶̺̍͝ ̶̣͔̋ŝ̵̢̝h̸̻̥̽̂o̷̤͚̓̐w̴͎͍̌ ̴̢̝̓y̵̡̼̕o̷̫̜̔̽u̵̡͋͐

ooh I like how you did that. What’s that called again?

I think III would be better titled “Post-Hoc Hypothesizing,” i.e. where you create (or change) your experiment’s hypothesis after the experiment - clearly that is wrong. “Post-hoc storytelling” sounds like what you do in the “implications” or “next steps” part of a paper. Also, exploratory studies have different standards, right? (I’ve never done an exploratory study.)

In the graphic, I thought “Non-Publication” and “Partial Publication” referred to experiments, i.e. where you run 4 experiments and only report on the last one, which “worked” – clearly that is wrong. However they are talking about data, which is a bit trickier. In some cases you can’t just upload all your data onto github; it may take a while because some sponsor or corporate office needs to review it before it can be released. A researcher may refuse to release their data until they finish writing a set of papers based on it. There may also be distribution limitations, or licensing requirements related to the data. I’m not trying to defend withholding data, just that these are the problems that need to be addressed.

Finally, to extend the metaphor, the “publish or perish” mentality is this image’s Satan.

They were very pro-r$ddit during the API purge.

Still, it’s good to see them “on the right side of history” now.

thx!

just eat it that way

Yeah I wouldn’t have blended it either, but to each their own.

my personal order of preference:

• !onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone
• !19684@lemmy.blahaj.zone
• !196@pawb.social
• !196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
• !196@lemmy.world
• !196@lemmy.eco.br
• !moretankie196@lemmygrad.ml

You’re on a good instance. Go crazy, fam.

Now that you mention it, there are a couple of us posting regularly on !bmoviebonanza@lemmy.world and !fullmoviesonyoutube@lemm.ee and I sometimes post to !martialartsmovies@lemm.ee , !badmovies@lemmy.world , and !cultfilms@lemux.minnix.dev. If you add them all together you have a pretty vibrant community.

Maybe we should do that thing where we link to each other’s communities in the sidebar, like a “movie ring” or something?

In the best possible sense of the word.

agreed. at most it belongs on !fedibridge@lemmy.dbzer0.com so we can consider how we can use it to advertise lemmy to disenchanted r$dditors.

Nah, Alaska’s reliably Republican. Now Hawaii on the other hand…

Read up on the history of Latin America to see where we’re headed. There are a couple different possibilities.

omg you’re right… I’ve been off r$ddit long enough that I didn’t recognize that… I guess I’m starting to heal…

Well it was the 80s and standards for special effects were a lot lower. Nobody expected this to be a huge hit let alone spawn a franchise, and it had a pretty modest budget. Nevertheless I like this one a lot better better than the second, and I haven’t even seen the others.

People do various things to get the movies past youtube’s copyright algorithms. They adjust color and framerate slightly, they might clip the video (i.e. remove a “margin”), they might remove telltale soundtrack, they might not mention the movie name in the description, etc., and I think if the movie is not monetized the standards are lower. I think if the algorithms don’t detect it, it stays up until a copyright owner issues a takedown claim through youtube. I’m not an expert tho so I dunno.

How could 501 people downvote such a brilliant work of fiction?

How many universities will abandon free speech rights for 10% of their budget?

All of them. Of course they’ll frame it like “to enable our storied institution to continue performing our vital work, we are temporarily putting a moratorium on non-pre-approved meetings. Thank you for your understanding.”

Today many of you will learn a new word.

A kynodesmē (Greek: κυνοδέσμη, English translation: “dog tie”) was a cord or string[1] or sometimes a leather strip that was worn primarily by athletes in Ancient Greece and Etruria to prevent the exposure of the glans penis in public (considered to be ill-mannered) and to restrict untethered movement of the penis during sporting competition. It was tied tightly around the akroposthion, the most distal, tubular portion of the foreskin that extends beyond the glans. As depicted in Ancient Greek art the kynodesme was worn by some athletes, actors, poets, symposiasts and komasts. It was worn temporarily while in public and could be taken off and put back on at will. The remaining length of cord could either be attached to a waist band to pull the penis upward and expose the scrotum, or tied around the base of the penis and scrotum so that the penis appeared to curl upwards.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kynodesme (includes photographs)

In the context of the OP joke that would be a: jynodesmē.