• 0 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle

  • After sparing this paper a fair bit of attention I feel I’ve wasted it.

    Nowhere in the paper could i find in what conditions the test samples were kept during the experiment. This is pretty basic stuff. At this stage I’d wage sloshing was the issue.

    Reading this part of the methodology:

    "2.2 Initial sperm analysis

    After liquefaction…

    [Two paragraphs later, in the same section: ] After this first analysis, the 15 sperm samples were split into two fractions. All the samples were exposed to ‘Parabolic flight’ (split 1) and to…"

    Did they liquefied the samples and tested like that? Whaa?

    The “After this first analysis” should not be in the “2.2 Initial sperm analysis”. It just shouldn’t!

    Then I think “15 sperm samples were split into two fractions”. … “the samples were exposed to ‘Parabolic flight’ (split 1)” — splits, fractions, what a mess!! At this stage I’ve wasted enough.

    The paper should be retracted, the reviewers spanked and the editor fired.








  • I follow these:

    • Anne Applebaum @anneapplebaum@journa.host

    • WarInTheFuture @WarInTheFuture@mstdn.social

    • ChrisO_wiki @ChrisO_wiki@mastodon.social

    • Tendar @Tendar@newsie.social

    • OSINTtechnical @osinttechnical@mstdn.social

    • NOELREPORTS @noelreports@mstdn.social

    • MAKS 23 @MAKS23@mastodon.social

    • War Mapper @warmapper@mstdn.social

    • Anders Puck Nielsen @anderspuck@krigskunst.social

    • Mark Hertling @markhertling@mstdn.social

    • Darth Putin @DarthPutinKGB@mastodon.world

    • Putin @putin@nafo.uk

    Will follow more after this thread! :)

    But, IMHO, the best way to find your own sources is to explore by hashtags , like:

    [https://mastodon.social/tags/ukraine]