

It’s also clear that you’re making things up, sparky.
It’s also clear that you’re making things up, sparky.
You’re still a tinfoil hat wearing crackpot, spud.
It is if you want to be taken seriously, sweetie.
It’s not unreasonable to ask someone to elaborate or justify their opinion, kiddo.
I didn’t realize it from the spoiler descriptions, but it made total sense when I saw the chapter. Who else but the Alabasta crew would know what an X on your left forearm means?
That was a clever message from Vivi.
The part where it gives random results of varying quality, sparky.
Wrong again, sparky.
You certainly seem to care, sparky.
It’s not hard to understand that you’re a bigot.
It’d help if you weren’t spewing bigoted nonsense.
Your definition of mutilation is driven by bigotry, not facts.
Then it’s a good thing that gender affirming care, such as puberty blockers, isn’t self harm.
How, exactly, is a therapist awful for giving sound medical advice? Keep in mind, you’re not qualified to say whether they’re a good idea. Neither am I. But the people who are haven’t found a problem.
No, it means you don’t go through puberty then. Cisgendered kids are given them for condition like precocial puberty, and they go through it just fine when they’re no longer on the blockers.
You’d understand these things if you bothered to examine any of this topic beyond shouting, “TRANS BAD!”
There wouldn’t be much point in giving them to people who’ve finished going through puberty. Speaking of points, I know you think you have one here, but it’s not very good.
No, they really don’t.
No, you really haven’t. Nobody is “mutilating” trans kids, and it’s because those kids can’t give consent.
No, it’s very clear that he was.
We should start pronouncing it dog-e to annoy the MAGATs