In their human choice benchmarks it was only chosen 59% of the time compared to 4o. That’s a 15-20x cost increase for 9% difference.

Poor moderator probably had a foot fetish

It’s insane that they’re still trying to blame user error for this basic issue. The design shouldn’t allow double the rated amperage to go through a single wire/pin without causing the whole thing to shutdown.

Immortals is far too generic to be a problem, there are plenty of other works that also use that name. The name changed from gods and monsters because they didn’t want to fight monster energy and potentially delay the game.

This would also effectively ban the use of any research produced by a Chinese national. Any papers which cite the work of Chinese labs (most of them) would be illegal, as this could be interpreted as aiding Chinese AI research.

200 tokens per second isn’t achievable with a 1.5B even on low-midrange GPUs. Unless they’re attaching an external GPU it’s not happening on a raspberry pi.

This article is disjointed and smells like AI.

The most important part to note is that 80% is held in a single wallet. The rug pull potential is high even by crypto standards.

The llama-1 paper acknowledged the use of the books dataset, libgen isn’t mentioned in any of the papers so this is new info.

And I declare the US to be “South Canada”

Ford is a corrupt POS but this is one of his only good stances.

The reason plane accidents are less common is because the worst licensed pilot is more competent than the average licensed driver by a wide margin

Airplanes will never be pilotless, there will always be a human in the loop for redundancy. A failure in a self driving car could kill a few people at most, a failure in a pilotless plane could kill thousands.

My solution:

The outer square lines in the third column/row is the result of the difference between what exists in the first two items in that row/column. Only outer lines appearing only once will be in the 3rd shape. The center lines seem to be only center lines that appear in both shapes. Therefore x is 52, since all outer shapes cancel and there are no shared center lines. The rest is fairly simple.

The second derivative of f(x) is 78x + 22, so the answer is 78(52) + 22 + 52 = 4130

I’m not completely confident in this solution but it seems to be consistent with the known columns and rows.

Looks like I got early access: %

I like that it’s possible, but I think it should be treated like a permission with a user accessible toggle in settings for each app.

Tech bros have ruined the prestige of a lot of titles. Software “Engineer”, Systems “Architect”, Data “Scientist”, Computer “Wizard”, etc.

I can’t stand Ford, but this would be a good move.

You can but if you want to get a perfect score at the evaluation after year 2 you need to complete the community center and meet a few other requirements. You can reevaluate at any time after the 2 years but it’s more interesting to do it within the original time limit.

I don’t know what you’re talking about. Stardew Valley is the most anxiety filled game I’ve ever played. 100s of goals, each with many codependencies and individual time constraints, all to be completed within a 2 year window.

Probably just a reporting bug. Comments stayed consistent.