Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoMore like guidelineslemmy.worldimagemessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1210arrow-down19cross-posted to: memes@sopuli.xyz
arrow-up1201arrow-down1imageMore like guidelineslemmy.worldRozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square14fedilinkcross-posted to: memes@sopuli.xyz
minus-squarelowleveldata@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year ago zero weight were easily observable how?
minus-squaretigeruppercut@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·1 year agoPeople looked at yo mama and could immediately conceive of the opposite
minus-squarelowleveldata@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 year ago conceive of the opposite Meh I don’t believe that they could avoid overshooting to negative weight
minus-squareBillyTheSkidMark@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoI guess in terms of an actual weightless object… Not… But if you have 2 equal weight items, call their combined weight 1 weight unit, take one away, that’s half a weight unit, take two away, that’s zero weight units.
how?
People looked at yo mama and could immediately conceive of the opposite
Meh I don’t believe that they could avoid overshooting to negative weight
I guess in terms of an actual weightless object… Not… But if you have 2 equal weight items, call their combined weight 1 weight unit, take one away, that’s half a weight unit, take two away, that’s zero weight units.
Clouds.
Clouds