The GNOME Foundation is thrilled to announce the GNOME project is receiving €1M from the Sovereign Tech Fund to modernize the platform, improve tooling and accessibility, and support features that are in the public interest.

This investment will fund the following projects until the end of 2024:

  • Improve the current state of accessibility
  • Design and prototype a new accessibility stack
  • Encrypt user home directories individually
  • Modernize secrets storage
  • Increase the range and quality of hardware support
  • Invest in Quality Assurance and Developer Experience
  • Expand and broaden freedesktop APIs
  • Consolidate and improve platform components
  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Huge congrats on everyone who got this working. €1M will really go a long way and GNOME absolutely deserves it!

    Expand and broaden freedesktop APIs

    I am very excite

    • KDE fanboi
  • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really do wish governments invested more in open source. If it’s a generic thing like an operating system that the public could benefit from at large, they would be doing the public a service.

  • jack@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m very interested in the secrets storage. Hopefully that includes integrating programs with GNOME Secrets, especially firefox

  • Shadywack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This money would have been far better given to KDE instead of the assholes at Gnome.

    • MadBigote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      How so? I miss the old gnome, but I have accepted gnome 3 for what it is. Kde was quite interesting for me back in 2012, but it didn’t perform well with my old setup. What’s new with kde? Id like to give it a try, but I’m too old to break my SO by having both gnome and kde on it.

      • Shadywack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The KDE guys have been on fire for the past two years. Between their theming, color selection, and session handling they’ve come a long ways. They’ve also implemented some gnome-only features such as the overview, albeit in a very optional way. As opposed to eliminating a panel and forcing you to use the overview to see what applications or windows you have open, or available to launch, it’s just a window management tool instead of a UX paradigm.

        Their wayland session is stable and also deals with xwayland in a very different way. If you set a custom scaling factor, the QT apps and GTK apps are talked to in a way that makes the same scaling factor consistent across all your applications, even under a wayland session with xwayland. The Gnome devs hand-wring about how the world has to be perfect before implementing an idea, where the KDE devs try something and then iterate if it’s successful.

    • unexpectedteapot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am aware of the difference in philosophy taken by both Gnome and KDE, but would you mind elaborating on the ‘assholes’ bit?

  • Sentau@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    How are gnome supposed to improve hardware support? Do gnome devs write drivers and such at the present time¿?

    • FOSS Is Fun@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Variable refresh rate (VRR), HDR, OLED (e. g. I’d like the panel to become grey and move items around a bit to lessen burn-in) all involve GNOME for hardware support.

      • Sentau@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I forgot about monitor support. Guess that’s pretty important. But is pixel shifting gnome’s responsibility or should that be done through monitor firmware so that it’s OS agnostic¿?

        • FOSS Is Fun@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your’re right, ideally wear reduction should probably be done by the display itself. But considering how little manufacuters often care about OS-agnostic approaches, it might be necessary to have software workarounds?

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Great news! Maybe now they’ll spare a day of work to get desktop icons going again. No more funding excuses for the fanboys now.