Thumbnail is clickbait in the sense that the video does not address specific instances by specific creators, but is more of a call on everyone to reflect on certain behaviors we might/might not engage with. Just watch the first two minutes if that’s all the time you have right now, but do that much at least.

Edit: Some people are taking quotes that the AI has written in a comment and acting as if that’s what’s actually in the video. It’s not. I thought it should be obvious that if you want to critique the video, you have to watch it rather than depend on an AI to to provide a a summary.

    • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t post shit like this here again. And if anyone sees this again let me know and I’ll lightning remove it.

      Also if you want to participate in this community, participate in it don’t post AI garbage

      • LibsEatPoop [any]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I appreciate the AI summary being removed because of the way some people were taking it, but you might have been a bit too hostile. They’d edited the comment when they saw others take AI arguments seriously and as a substitute for the video, and at the bottom they’d mentioned a Men’s Lib group (the good kind) that talked about similar issues. So, I don’t think they were engaging in bad faith, just unfamiliar with how AI is perceived here.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          How do you imagine that some LLM that doesn’t even have access to the video would be able to summarize it? I’d give it less than a 50% chance of giving a decent summary of most novels or short stories unless you paste the whole text into the prompt. What the hell is it supposed to do about a video?

      • LibsEatPoop [any]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you want to critique the video, please do it after watching it, rather than taking what the AI wrote as gospel. It misses the nuances of the argument, even in what it wrote as the “thesis”.

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Masculine values and actions like public organizing and intellectual debate are prioritized over feminine values like emotional work and art.

      I’m sorry, what? Organizing and discussion are “male values”? Emotion and art are “female values”?

      Jesus, talk about Patriarchal thinking.

    • LibsEatPoop [any]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a good summary. Misses some of the nuances, obviously, and makes it seem more basic/superficial than it is, but as far as the structure goes, I think it is good.

      But one of the core parts of this video that really resonated with me, and which this summary missed entirely, was that at the end of every section, there were questions that the OP posed to us, the audience, to reflect/think on, based on that section. I think that’s extremely important, because, if you are willing to be challenged, then the video can do that. It’s not just “patriarchy bad”.