• tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    There’s that joke about wearing regular clothes on Halloween to go as the “gifted kid”, and when people ask what you’re supposed to be you sigh and say you were supposed to be a lot of things.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    You’re gifted enough to cruise through the first few stages of your education without trying, so you forge an identity as “the smart kid” but never build up skills in learning or studying, so when you finally get to a level where your natural intelligence can’t carry you anymore you can’t keep up with the people who did learn those skills and you start to fail and lose your identity as the smart kid which causes you to break down because that’d how you defined yourself for so long… or so I’ve heard.

    • BillDoor@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      This isn’t true at all. IQ isn’t some magical catch-all measure of a person’s intellectual ability, but it’s not entirely total quackery either.

      I suspect that academic success would be very strongly correlated with having a supportive home life, but IQ not so much. Maybe the gifted kids you refer to were the academically successful ones and not the high-IQ ones?

      • Farman [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        They once had me take one of those horoscopes and one part of it was a rorschach test. How is that not quakery.

        Another part was to have me write a short text wich fair enough.

        fill in mulltiple choise questions that were deliveratly obtuse and ambigous.

        The only part that i would expect to corrrelaete with intelligence was when i had to memorize a string of numbers and repeat it after a while. But even then this is an ability you can train.

              • Farman [any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                You are the one trying to start shit here. If you had a more nuanced response. In this case, an example would be descriving your experience. You would get a more nuanced response. See the other guy.

                But im glat i touched a sore spot for you.

                • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  All I did was say I took an IQ test that didn’t have any of the elements in yours. You came back calling me stupid.

                  Elaborate on how I started shit with you. Explain yourself. How the fuck do you envision yourself as being justified. How the fuck do you explain your perception of me starting shit with you.

  • rubpoll [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    The creator of this comic is a self-described pro-sweatshop neoliberal, which explains the “woe is me, I’m too smart for my own good” delusions.

    • jackalope@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t think he’s ever come out in favor of sweatshops? Maybe you’re think of Matt ygelsia from vox.

    • tweeks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Do you have a source for that? I cannot find anything about it online in Google, Wiki or even in ChatGPT delusions.

    • scubbo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Sure, because something so egregious would definitely show up in a Google search for “Zach Weinersmith sweatshop”, right?

      Unless…you’re exaggerating on the Internet to stir up outrage?