Yeah it’s a really obvious one, too. The person responding with the Wikipedia article and calling you wrong is actually providing evidence that it’s a bad photoshop.
Y’all are fucking harsh, damn. I just wanted to share my photography. It’s edited in Lightroom for lighting, but the colors are real. Here is the unedited version.
No one noticing this is a terrible photoshop makes me suspicious Lemmy is mostly bots and stupid people
I think you’re wrong. It’s called Calypte costae https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Costa’s_hummingbird
The image on Wikipedia and the one posted helps to show exactly why the post is a bad Photoshop.
Still not sure what you mean. The brightness of the colors changes alot according to the angle like you can see in videos. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlYecLQDaUM
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=SlYecLQDaUM
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.
Yeah it’s a really obvious one, too. The person responding with the Wikipedia article and calling you wrong is actually providing evidence that it’s a bad photoshop.
Y’all are fucking harsh, damn. I just wanted to share my photography. It’s edited in Lightroom for lighting, but the colors are real. Here is the unedited version.