(OP’s comment)

I’ve been in contact with quite a few LMG employees. Many have given me statements about the abuse and sexual harassment Madison endured while working there.

One of them also gave me a recording of this meeting that was never supposed to be released. This is my proof that I have talked to LMG employees and have sources inside. I post this as verification of that fact.

I cannot out these people or give direct quotes out of fear they will suffer consequences, but I hope they come forward publicly even if it means risking their careers.

I can tell you their accounts match hers. And even go into further detail. One person constantly was mentioned more than others, but she’s not naming names so I won’t either.

She is telling the truth.

This meeting kinda goes along with how she mentioned her being sexually harassed was regarded as he causing drama.

  • Bread@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    There is nothing in this audio recording that I find particularly concerning other than James’ comment. It sounds just like a standard meeting that I would have had during a morning brief. Knowing the context of James’ comment was directed at Linus, who is a close friend, probably smirked and kept on going.

    When you add the context of sexual harassment, it doesn’t look good and is an inappropriately timed joke. However, nothing about the meeting indicates that it was about sexual harassment in particular from listening to the audio. If I missed it, please inform me.

    Maybe it is because I heard these types of conversations frequently, it doesn’t seem like a big deal. They even say you can contact a manager, Linus or Yvonne, or the anonymous hotline. So people have options if they have a problem in particular with leadership.

    I am not dismissing that sexual harassment may have taken place, but from the context from the audio given, it doesn’t appear anyone speaking knows about it.

  • Magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Seems to confirm the fact that the complaints were not seen as more than gossip. This meeting sounds like a not so elaborate attempt at lid installation on a boiling issue.

  • TimeMuncher2@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Doesn’t look professional. Looks like a family run business meeting in the kitchen of a small restaurant where they blame the staff for all the problems.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The point of the release seems to be to prove that they have insider infoz not to say this audio release is damning. It just adds credence to other information.

  • bacondragonoverlord@feddit.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Transcription by u/Elnachohat

    Transcription if you’re having trouble hearing:

    (speaker 1, Linus) So we called this meeting because it’s come to our attention that we need to have a quick chat about the best way to handle HR related feedback and rumors. We won’t be giving any names for what I hope are extraordinarily obvious reasons, but what we can do is give you the following guidelines for problem solving and conflict resolution.

    Sorry that this is all boring and corporate, but here we are. Number one, always stand up for what’s right. We’re only a team as long as we’re all working together and working for each other. That’s the most important one. Number two, always reflect on your own personal experiences and use your common sense. Few things in life are truly black and white. Number three, always wait to hear both sides of a story before passing your own judgment. Be cautious when you know that one side is bound by legal and ethical disclosure guidelines, when the other is not. Carefully consider what it says about the character of someone who would engage in that type of gossip against someone who has no power to defend themselves.

    Number four, always encourage openness and transparency. If you have a problem, you need to speak up. We want to fix it. If you receive feedback about somebody else at this company, the first response is, have you spoken with this person? Followed closely by, you need to speak with this person. We don’t solve interpersonal issues here, or really anywhere in your life, if you wish to live in a drama free zone, by engaging in water cooler politicking. So, if for any reason that individual is not comfortable approaching the person they’re having a conflict with, we have a chain that they’re supposed to follow.

    So first, you advise them to take the problem to their manager. Followed by me or Yvonne, followed by our third party HR firm. I hope that you all trust that we’re here to make this a safe, fun, and productive workplace, and we won’t tolerate mistreatment of any of our team members.

    If you have any reason to believe otherwise, then I refer you again to point number four, which is to address the issue with the individual directly, or bring it to me or Yvonne, or bring it to our third party HR firm. Since I’m not at liberty to share any details about what occurred, uh, all I can do is ask that you trust me and Yvonne.

    Um, some of you know us very well, I’ve been here a very long time, um, some of you have not been here for as long, but I like to think that whether you’ve been here for nine years or nine days, you’re here for a reason and you believe that we are utmost to run this company with integrity and compassion.

    Um, We can’t solve problems we don’t know about though, so on that note, I’d like to invite anyone who has concerns about a fellow team member or about a manager to submit their feedback either by speaking with their manager, me or Yvonne directly, or if you would prefer to provide your feedback anonymously, we have an option for that as well.

    It’s the manager and co worker feedback form. Uh, Yvonne, if you’re not aware of it, show of hands who is not aware of it. Hey, a lot of people aren’t aware of it. Good, so now we all know. There’s an anonymous form, if for whatever reason you’re not comfortable, (inaudible) you can talk to me or Yvonne directly about it (inaudible) in the general chat.

    It’s a safe space to provide us ideas for improvement, or if you’re consumed by the holiday spirit and you want to say nice things, you can do that too. Does anybody else have any questions?

    Not a single questions? Wow, that must have been a really good speech.

    (speaker 2, James)You gonna dance on that table, or just stand on it?

    (speaker 1, Linus)That’s it! So, um, Yvonne, did you have anything you wanted to add?

    (speaker 3, Yvonne)(inaudible) Somebody said (inaudible) if you guys want to sanitize your hands, help yourself with free (inaudible)?

    (speaker 1, Linus)Yeah, that was actually just totally random timing. It came up the stairs a moment ago. Dennis is on it. Alright. Thank you everyone. Have a wonderful and, uh, productive rest of your day. And weekend.

    EDIT: added who was speaking. Don’t know who speaker 2 is.

    EDIT 2: I was told Speaker 2 is James

    EDIT 3: Ivonne > Yvonne

    EDIT 4: “near Yvonne directly” > me or Yvonne directly" and fixed that last thing Yvonne said

    • ArtificialLink@yall.theatl.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Sounds like a pretty standard meeting imo. Does that mean they haven’t committed transgressions or don’t need to change. But for a company of their size at the time there is nothing particularly wrong with what was said here.

      • maiskanzler@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        There was a comment a bit similar to yours on the original reddit thread and I think it got a good reply by the OP. The main criticism was that their structure for escalating such problems is flawed. Talking to your manager about his/her misbehaviour isn’t exactly the solution here.

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Yup. It seems to me that Madison’s case is one which anyone at LMG who cares, would not have been ok with, but that their policies have big enough cracks that it was still allowed to happen, and she didn’t have an effective way to get herself heard.

          Wanting to do the right thing, doesn’t mean you automatically succeed in doing so.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      That is an absolute disaster of a meeting. So much wrong there. Linus is 100% not trained for hr or equal opportunity.

      FYI: if you aren’t trained for this or aren’t reading a script, DO NOT do an off the cuff meeting on it.

      Especially if you’re the god damned boss.