• GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    But Wednesday’s move to significantly bump prices, marked an acknowledgment by Iger of the media giant’s intent to squeeze more revenue out of streaming by pushing consumers to the advertising-supported plans, which have proven to be more profitable.

    “The advertising marketplace for streaming is picking up,” Iger told investors on the quarterly earnings call. “It’s more healthy than the advertising marketplace for linear television. We believe in the future of advertising on our streaming platforms, both Disney+ and Hulu.”

    This is extremely important for them. Netflix’s excellent deal for most of its streaming existence was obviously a thorn in the side of many other businesses. Even if streaming services can get you to pay an exorbitant amount of money on an ad-free tier, advertisers are frothing for the chance to advertise to you regardless. They want you to see their ads so badly. And let’s not forget all the big tech companies, Netflix included, were riding high during the free money days of 0% interest loans. Those days are over, and the bill is due. Wall Street wants its money. And we are all the ones who have to pay up. Cheap streaming is officially over.

    This is why these companies, including Netflix, have all introduced ad tiers. Not only is it a great way for them to juice their revenue streams, but also every other company wants a permanent residence in your brain, and then some. Given the way things have been going since duo-eras of the COVID pandemic and corporate profit-based inflation, they don’t even need to collude on prices. All the execs need to do is look at the business press and say, “Hey, they’re getting away with increased prices and password sharing crackdowns. We can do the same thing. The pay pigs keep paying!”

      • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Big advertising budgets that are funded from the value alienated from exploited workers and consumers. Information asymmetry in the marketplace means that even if you make a superior product at a lower price, you could still be outcompeted by an expensive inferior product if more people know about that worse product and don’t know about your product.

        That’s for most basic products anyway. Luxury products like bags and clothes are almost all marketing since the cost to create them is so low compared to their sales price. People buy them because of perceptions created by marketing and not any inherent value in the product itself.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        As far as I know internet advertising is an economy destroying sunk cost fallacy. No one makes money off of it, but if they stop basically everything collapses catastrophically, so they just keep pouring more money in to it in hopes that someone will find a way to make it profitable before the bill comes due.

      • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 years ago

        You know it’s coming. Why would a streaming company want a consumer buying one month, binging a single show they’re interested in, then immediately cancelling the subscription after, when you could guarantee a 6- or 12-month revenue stream for them?

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Might fuck around and start invoicing companies for attention time, comprehension time, storage capacity, and of course the 500$ per instance recall fee.

    • JohnnyDanger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’m not even going to bother with that, all the shows are shit.

      Steaming and gaming companies are so bad these day motherfuckers are actually going outside and enjoying life.

  • Mardoniush [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    sings Farewell and adieu to you greedy streamers.
    Farewell and adieu, to you subscription pains
    For we’re now returning to the torrents of the pirates
    and we may ner see you curs’d streamers again

    We’ll post and we’ll flame like true software pirates
    we’ll post and we’ll flame, all over the net
    Until we can find us an FTP server
    And get all the slop that we’re ach’n to get

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      We really have a moral duty to make piracy as easy, one button, even grandpa can do it as possible.

      Not for any, like, good of humanity reason.

      But as part of my revenge against The Mouse.

  • FakeNewsForDogs [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I realized a year or so ago (after a letter from my isp) that I didn’t actually need to torrent anymore. There are websites like bflix.io (and I’m sure many others) that have basically everything streaming for free. Fuck subscriptions. Would maybe go back to torrenting if I got a vpn sorted out, but you’re not gonna get in trouble for streaming shit on a pirate website, so for now it’s the best solution I’ve found. Certainly not paying any of these assholes. Lol. Fuck outta here with that.

    • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      Proton mail has a free VPN that works really well. Switzerland is part of world coverage tier, but Netherlands is just as good at hiding torrenting from ISP’s. And it can even use a ‘stealth mode’ that works fairly well to get around VPN blockers by using unusual protocols for the traffic.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Is there something like that that works on an nVidia Shield (Android TV)?

      Rather not have the Uberspreadsheetboxen running just to watch Village of the Damned again…

    • JustSomePerson@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Is there a good way to watch on a proper TV? I find that all such sites are browser based, and I’m not keen on typing in urls with the remote control.

  • ExLisper@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m paying for Spotify and Netflix because they are very convenient. I’m not paying for another 5 subscriptions because they maybe have this one show I would like to watch. They worked hard on fragmenting the marked and now they will complain people don’t want to pay for 10 different subscriptions

    • raptir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Music services are almost a necessity to me because of the amount of music I listen to, but it’s also a different animal. They all have mostly the same library, so you won’t typically be subscribing to more than one.

      The problem with streaming video services is that most people watch a couple genres, and there’s content in every genre on every streaming platform. I watch a lot of scifi, for example. So I would need to subscribe to Apple TV for Silo and Foundation, Paramount+ for Star Trek, etc…

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s an ironic end to the streaming wars. After pouring billions and billions of dollars into constructing supposedly revolutionary streaming platforms, and decimating the business models that had offered the industry stability for decades, the ultimate product looks awfully similar to what companies and consumers were trying to break free from in the first place.

    I’ll still take streaming any day over cable.

    No contract and you can put everything in rotation. Sign up for a month, binge, cancel, next.

    • mild_deviation@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 years ago

      Sign up for a month, binge, cancel, next.

      That’s not going to last. As soon as they run the numbers and decide it’s worth it, they’ll create ways to lock you in.

    • lukzak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 years ago

      The streaming companies are starting to get wise to that. They’ve started splitting seasons and releasing them separately so that you have to be subbed for 2 months.

        • VernetheJules [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          Sure until they start adding game mechanics like daily login rewards and episode “loot boxes” that give you a chance to increment your streaming battle pass so you finally have a shot at rolling for the show you actually want.

          • lukzak@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            That’s a real concern if you’re at all worried about spoilers. It’s so easy just to have shit spoiled even if you try to avoid it. Passively hearing about it from school/workmates, social media, or even radio. The stupid radio spoiled the ending of Breaking Bad for me and I never got over it, I guess.

      • CybranM@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Or they could release one per week, two batches isn’t really “starting to get wise to that” imho. Either way, being patient is the best and only paying for one month

        • lukzak@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I think it’s just the beginning. They’ll split seasons eventually into 3 or more parts. Or if you wait till all seasons are released, they’ll paywall earlier parts. They know people won’t wait that long, especially with how easy it is to have things spoiled by social media or among friends/co-workers.

    • MoonRaven@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The difference between watching something programmers and on demand is big. I still detest the newer prices though coupled with the decline in interesting content.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Honestly people should probably be thinking about future-proofing things and putting as much media as physically possible on to drives in anticipation of whatever the next wave of bullshit. At some point Samizdat2.0 will probably be the only way to preserve and share media under the capitalist censorship regime. They’re just going to keep cracking down and cracking down and cracking down until no one can move without bleeding for the privilege.

      As they said in the bad old days: Keep circulating the tapes.

      Until we can pull this whole bullshit edifice down, kick it in the kidneys a few times, and set it on fire the only way to protect media from the companies that “own” it is going to be little people with really big RAID arrays.

    • Album@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Is that true? Most of the best public trackers got shut down. Anything left has bots recording your IP and you’re getting a letter from your ISP.

      If you’re not on a private ratio tracker or paid tracker it’s basically a non starter. So I’m not sure about unaffected era the last 10 years have been brutal for pirates via torrent.

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        VPN has been necessary for pirating for a long time. And fortunately a VPN is cheaper then any streaming service, and has other benefits besides.

      • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        If you’re torrenting without a VPN you’re doing it wrong. Also you should look at Usenet instead.

        • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          What’s the situation with usenet these days ? I preferred nzbs over torrents for several years but it just became impossible at around the time nzbmatrix chucked it in.

          • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 years ago

            Better than ever! Seriously.

            Indexers like NZBGeek, Drunkenslug, and NZBFinder have resulted in me getting almost anything I want, short of some obscure Australia series from the 80s. Providers are doing 2000+ days retention and I’m only using 1 myself, never even needed to get a backup on a different backbone.

  • uralsolo [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago
    I mean this is basically inevitable. We know that capitalism doesn't actually seek the lowest price as its evangelists usually preach, but the highest - and so there is no way that streaming will not balloon over time to a price comparable to the cable TV plans of the past.

    🏴‍☠️ yo ho yo ho a pirate’s life for me 🏴‍☠️

    • El_Rocha@lm.put.tf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Capitalism seeks the highest profit, but what that means depends on the customers.

      With the Netflix password sharing crackdown risky bet, customers answered loud and clear: they are more than willing to pay more money to access the same content instead of standing their ground on the decision.

      When there is actual competition and customers are demanding of what the offering should be, that’s when we see prices go down.

      There are an increasing number of markets where monopolies and deals between companies leave people without any choice to make at all, but I don’t think the market of streaming services is an example of this.

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      In fact, consumers who bundle just a few streamers together in 2023 will find that the final cost is effectively the same as basic cable. Couple that reality with the introduction of ads into streaming and the end product eerily resembles on-demand cable.

    • thelokes@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I stepped away from having any home infrastructure other than a proper firewall about a decade ago when streaming was so affordable and content was so bountiful on the few streaming platforms that existed. Now I finds myself considering diving straight back into setting up a NAS and hosting locally at home again. Is Plex still a decent choice to stream from your collection while traveling?

      • player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Plex is still a good choice. I find that Jellyfin has better performance, recognizes and organized my media better, but it’s more complicated to set up remote access on jellyfin.

        I would prefer to move to Jellyfin long-term but I need to get access to port forwarding from my landlord first.

    • rab@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Sad thing is that most people are far too lazy and will just pay the streaming cost