• bugsmith@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    That’s a bit of a silly statement. Once you’ve installed a few extensions for your language (a language server and linting at minimum), it is effectively an IDE with a reasonably powerful debugger included. Just because it’s modular and not “batteries included” doesn’t make it incomparable.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Have you ever used JetBrains products for any serious development?

      • bugsmith@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Sure. But I didn’t say it was either. I only pointed out that it’s silly to say “there’s no comparison”, when most functionality is easily achievable on both. And depending on language, it’s not even difficult.

        Edit: In fairness, I did say “it’s effectively an IDE”, but I stand by the point that after a few extensions - what is the difference? If I can debug, refactor, and and get complete intellisense (including finding declarations etc), I’m doing more or less everything I would in a dedicated IDE.

        Edit 2: I feel I’ve gone to far the other way. I have used am am aware of some of the capabilities that a fill fledged IDE has over something like VSCode. Especially for languages like those of the C-family. But I do take issue with implying they’re not comparable. For many usecases and languages, they’re totally comparable.