Where is the outrage? Where have all the “humans” gone? Israel slaughtered over 300 innocent civilians in Gaza last night. Most of them women and children.

None of those with #Ukraine, #Canada, #Mexico and #EU flags on their profile raising their voice condemning this outrageous crime.

-----------
The sheikh wandered around the city with a lamp

I’m tired of all the devils and the death, and seeking one human

They said it cannot be found, we have searched, As we said before

That which cannot be found I desire

Rumi
دی شیخ با چراغ همی‌ گشت گرد شهر
کز دیو و دد ملولم و انسانم آرزوست

گفتند یافت می‌ نشود جسته‌ ایم ما گفت
آن که یافت می‌ نشود آنم آرزوست
#poetry #Rumi #Gaza #Inhumanity #Death #politics #Israel #Genocide #WarCrime
@palestine@lemmy.ml @palestine@a.gup.pe @israel @iran

  • FatCrab@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    8 hours ago

    No, Israel-Palestine would likely be very different right now had Harris won. I don’t think it would be where we want it to be, and people like you would probably be saying how Trump would have fucked it up so hard that there’d have been no choice but to ceasefire or some such dumb ass mental gymnastics, but it is pretty obvious to anyone even minimalist informed that Harris/Dem admin would have been a VERY different situation for US support to Netanyahu.

    That said, it’s a waste of time to punch down, like you said. A not insignificant number of Arab American voters made a really stupid and poorly thought out choice, but nevertheless, a larger number of the electorate at large made a choice actually expecting this to happen. They are largely to blame and Republicans in general, from voter to elected, should be held responsible.

    • Count042@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      ‘Vote blue no matter who’ people like to say that it would have been different ( with the implication that different would be better) but they very rarely say how.

      The few times they do say how, it’s generally the work of minutes to one documentation of Biden doing the exact same thing.

      So.

      How?

      How would it have been different? And, because I’m emotionally drained from dealing with my cat dying, I’m going to specify that it actually has to be better, not just different.

    • Lupa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      We literally told her and the Dems what needed to happen in order to get our vote: commit to BDS. But they refused, and instead ran two very different campaign ads in SE Michigan and the rest of the country. That was our compromise and that was the Dem’s choice, not ours.

      Don’t forget, voting for the lesser of 2 evils is still voting for evil.

      • chingadera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah. But when the lesser of two evils wins, there is less evil.

        You know what doesn’t happen when you abstain? Less evil.

        The goal is and always should be less evil.

        • nargis@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Less evil for whom? The Arabs who lost family and friends to this war? Once you cross the threshold of genocide, does it even matter anymore? From an Arab’s perspective, it’s like asking what is worse, the Tasmanian genocide (which killed every full-blooded Tasmanian by 1876) or the Armenian genocide? What does it matter when both were literally the most evil you can get?

          I don’t fault American women/minorities for voting in their self interest. Abortion and queer rights was an issue for many people and they voted in for their rights. That’s a fault of the state. But when you lose family, friends, neighbours and country to a genocide, what does it matter? Family is the most important, after food and water. Death of family is extremely traumatic. And then telling those grieving people to go vote for a butcher against their own raging conscience and blaming them for Democrat incompetence is just evil. You voted for your self interest. They for theirs.

          • chingadera@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I’m going to go ahead and add to this, if you are willing cast aside progress in the name of perfection, you will never make it to either one.

            If you’re waiting for your dream candidate to come by, you’re waiting a very long time. Your vote should be to minimize pain and suffering for the largest amount of people possible. You cannot in good conscience say that a vote for Trump is that, and when it’s down to two people, you’ve just gotta do your best.

            This species functions best from community, we are a social species and our success depends on how we treat each other. Even if you are the most selfish person on the planet, it’s imperative that you vote for most people’s best interest because you will gain the most from it.

            • eldavi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              this form of propaganda is a false framing of reality to encourge people to vote with the seemingly “less evil” option while ignoring it’s consequences down the road and is a trap that will only present you with “less evil” options each and every time until the ultimate evil is reached anyways, like it has for the gazans.

              no one believes that trump is any less evil about any democrat and only people who have swallowed this propaganda believe that any imperialist is good for this or any genocide.

            • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Has there been progress in the US since way back in Reagan’s time?!

              Because at so many levels, from inequality and the collapse of social mobility to widespread civil society surveillance and support for Genocide abroad, the US has been constantly regressing for decades both under Democrats and Republicans.

              I mean, the last actual American President passing measures that one could call “progress” was JFK. Even Obama was the President that ordered the highest number of drone murders whilst in office of all and decided that the way to save the economy after the 2008 Crash was to protect asset owners and large financial institutions - the rich, not the rest - resulting in the steep increase in social inequality and final collapse of social mobility in the US of the last decade, and which created the fertile ground for the growth of support for the likes of Trump.

              From my viewpoint as an European, you’re just defending a slower regression, which is understandable but it ain’t “progress” (last chance at that was Bernie Sanders and his primary was very overtly torpedoed by the DNC), and it’s also understandable that others with strong moral convictions and even personal reasons connected to America’s continued descent into evil aren’t supporting any evil in America, even the “lesser” one that slows down the regression a bit.

              You would have been absolutelly right if this election was indeed progress vs regression, but it wasn’t, it was one Genocide-endorsing candidate who chose to try to attract far-right votes by getting cozier with the likes of the Cheney family versus a Genocide-endorsing candidate who is openly a far-right populist - two forms of evil differing mainly in delivery style and how fast do they want to go rightward - you blaming people for chosing “none of the above” is pure tribalism.

              • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Obama was the President that ordered the highest number of drone murders

                Drone murders was a right wing lie. Obama killed fewer than any modern President except Carter.

                Drones were not yet available in mass production during Bush Jr so Bush killed hundreds of thousands with regular bombs. Obama killed only hundreds of civilians. So to twist Obama’s record into something bad, right wing media talked endlessly about drones, while completely ignoring the drastically lower number of deaths. It would be like calling Bush Sr the Stealth bomber killer because Bush Sr was the first to really use Stealth fighters in the first Gulf War.

                Trump killed more in his first year with drones than Obama did in 8 years.

                https://airwars.org/research/civilian-deaths-by-us-president-in-iraq-and-syria/

                But as Joseph Goebels proved, if you repeat a lie long enough people will believe the lie.

          • chingadera@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Yes, but there’s less of it, which is an absolutely not debatable good thing comparatively.

            • eldavi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              whether there’s less or more of it matters significantly less than whether it’s let inside a cracked door where it WILL metastasize, as evidenced by this genocide and a multitude of others.

              • chingadera@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 hours ago

                No. You’re saying right now that you’d take stage 4 cancer over stage 1 because of the possibility of stage one getting to stage four?

                No.

                  • FatCrab@lemmy.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    No, they’re saying stage 1 can be fought and overcome at a far less deleterious price. Keep in mind, all of the voices that are ardently pro-Palestine caucus with democrats. If you are running from a fire, you don’t go into the room without any windows whatsoever because you’re pissed that the other room only has small windows.

    • nargis@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      people like you would probably be saying how Trump would have fucked it up so hard that there’d have been no choice but to ceasefire or some such dumb ass mental gymnastics

      I sincerely doubt it.