• Pup Biru@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    revolution is easy to say on the internet but at the end of the day a lot of people die

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 hours ago

      People die without revolution, historically revolutionary Socialism has come with dramatic improvements in quality of life for the Working Class. Taking down the US Empire would massively uplift the burden on the Global South as well.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        perhaps, or perhaps it could be replaced by something worse. there are no guarantees

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Read up on historical revolution, Socialist revolution has a great track record, and if the US Empire didn’t interfere it would be even better.

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            21 hours ago

            the nordic states seem to be doing pretty well at riding a good line, and whilst australia is far from socialist, what we have is working great too

            accident? no of course not… but consistency… a big bang “revolution” is the easy way out… it’s so easy to say you’ll fight for what you believe in when you don’t have to see what it’ll entail or what will come out the other side of it but the reality is far more bloody and is absolutely not what you have in your head afterwards

            • umbrella@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              21 hours ago

              the nordic countries do well at the cost of the third world. they are rich because of imperialism.

              • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                20 hours ago

                and you believe a revolution in the US will help the third world?

                socialist countries are plenty capable of being exploitative too. a revolution doesn’t change the people - it changes the power structures

                • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  20 hours ago

                  a socialist state would not spend public money so corporations can profit from waging endless war instead of just having solid healthcare.

                  • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    20 hours ago

                    all of the above listed counties have very solid healthcare and are not entirely socialist. what’s your point?

                    socialism is not a requirement for being a place that treats people with respect and dignity; nor is it a silver bullet