Rich people have staff that knows all their secrets; assistants, bodyguards, maids, drivers, … Their staff might abuse their position to steal, blackmail, or even sign book deals. They still have the staff.
When AI agents become useful for normal people, normal people will use them.
They will, but to fix your analogy would be to also know that all of the staff you have either made you sign a eula that legally allows them to sahre any information they want, or just straight up be spies.
If this was the case, I don’t think they would have that staff.
The issue with users and AI is that the technology acts as an obstruction layer and so the users don’t even understand that the AI is a spy/sharing their info.
Rich people have staff that knows all their secrets; assistants, bodyguards, maids, drivers, … Their staff might abuse their position to steal, blackmail, or even sign book deals. They still have the staff.
When AI agents become useful for normal people, normal people will use them.
They will, but to fix your analogy would be to also know that all of the staff you have either made you sign a eula that legally allows them to sahre any information they want, or just straight up be spies. If this was the case, I don’t think they would have that staff.
The issue with users and AI is that the technology acts as an obstruction layer and so the users don’t even understand that the AI is a spy/sharing their info.
Sadly, they will still use them.