Im not moving the goal posts. You said she should remove him without process and your citation states that there must be an opportunity to present a defense which he was not yet afforded.
Stop trying to misuse fallacies as a way of avoiding the flaws in your argument.
Im not moving the goal posts. You said she should remove him without process and your citation states that there must be an opportunity to present a defense which he was not yet afforded.
Stop trying to misuse fallacies as a way of avoiding the flaws in your argument.
I’m sorry, I must be blind. Please point out the word “trial” in that section of the New York State Constitution.
All I see is “… after giving to such officer a copy of the charges against him and an opportunity to be heard in his defense.”
Do you need me to explain what a trial is?
Be my guest. I’d like to see how many of the words in your “explanation” fail to appear in the quoted section of the NYS Constitution.
Seems to me if the author meant a trial, they’d have used the word trial.