Summary

Denmark’s Defense Intelligence Service warns that Russia could launch a large-scale war in Europe within five years if NATO appears weak or divided, especially if the U.S. does not intervene.

The report outlines a timeline where Russia could attack a neighboring country within six months, escalate to a regional Baltic conflict in two years, and potentially engage NATO-wide by 2029.

The assessment comes as Trump pressures NATO members to increase defense spending and has suggested the U.S. might not defend allies who fail to meet financial commitments.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Major war already started 3 years ago. Europe sat on its hands, and America is looking for the door.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Boy, it sure would be bad if the US population had voted a Russian stooge into the presidency for the next four years. Oh wait…

    • einkorn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      I do not have an English translation but in this interview a lieutenant general of the German Bundeswehr says that they are observing that not all new supplies are being pushed to the Ukrainian front lines and instead new stockpiles are being created.

      My personal expectation is that Putin will attempt one more push in Ukraine once mud season is over, take what he can get and then agree to another peace deal (Minsk 3 anyone?). He will then take some time to restructure and reinforce the military before again “coming to the aid of suppressed Russian minorities”, this time in places like Georgia, Moldova or Armenia. Ukraine is off the table because they will use the time to reinforce as well.

    • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Unfortunately, if they could foresee the consequences of their own actions, the war in Ukraine wouldn’t even have started

      • Mihies@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        TBH it’s still early for evaluating consequences - it might still prove beneficial for Russia, especially with orange in chief.

        • freebee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          They wasted hundreds of thousands in the meat grinder… The final outcome would have to be absolutely massive in favour of Russia for it to still be beneficial. Unlikely.

          • Mihies@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            26 days ago

            Depends on the perspective. To Putin it’s not a problem, for him people are expandable and cheap. You just write some laws and they grow again in his view. As the land grab is forever. Your and mine views are non-dictatorish and as such don’t apply to Russian imperialism.